1971
DOI: 10.1159/000259333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production et perception de la parole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present article, which really is concerned first and foremost with a slight restatement of "classical" phonetics, I shall adopt the organogenetic, the production side of speech rather than the perception side. It is important to keep in mind, however, that there is a good deal of evidence that we hear with a kind of kinesthetic hearing, in which the proprioceptive feedback of the organs of speech is involved in perception, the so-called "motor" theory of speech perception (for a good overview and a contrary opinion, see Lane 1970), and that it is well established that we hear our own voice through bone conduction (Bekesy 1962).…”
Section: Phoneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present article, which really is concerned first and foremost with a slight restatement of "classical" phonetics, I shall adopt the organogenetic, the production side of speech rather than the perception side. It is important to keep in mind, however, that there is a good deal of evidence that we hear with a kind of kinesthetic hearing, in which the proprioceptive feedback of the organs of speech is involved in perception, the so-called "motor" theory of speech perception (for a good overview and a contrary opinion, see Lane 1970), and that it is well established that we hear our own voice through bone conduction (Bekesy 1962).…”
Section: Phoneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%