2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and purification of extracellular chitinases from Penicillium aculeatum NRRL 2129 under solid-state fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…S1-13 was 1.8 U/g IDS on 11 days incubation (Nopakarn et al 2002). In case of CWB, maximum chitinase activity reported by SSF was 246.6 U/g IDS by B. bassiana BTMF S10 on wheat bran supplemented with colloidal chitin (Suresh and Chandrasekaran 1999), from B. felina RD 101 was 6.34 U/g IDS at 6 days (Pankaj et al 2005a), from P. chrysogenum was 3809 U/g IDS (Pankaj et al 2005b), from P. aculeatum NRRL 2129 was at 72 h (Binod et al 2005) and from T. harzianum was 3.18 at 96 h (Nampoothiri et al 2004). The differences in chitinase yields are related to fermenter design, specifically aeration and humidification suitable for growth (Yoyi et al 2004) and also the difference in the procedures and substrate used for chitinase assays.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1-13 was 1.8 U/g IDS on 11 days incubation (Nopakarn et al 2002). In case of CWB, maximum chitinase activity reported by SSF was 246.6 U/g IDS by B. bassiana BTMF S10 on wheat bran supplemented with colloidal chitin (Suresh and Chandrasekaran 1999), from B. felina RD 101 was 6.34 U/g IDS at 6 days (Pankaj et al 2005a), from P. chrysogenum was 3809 U/g IDS (Pankaj et al 2005b), from P. aculeatum NRRL 2129 was at 72 h (Binod et al 2005) and from T. harzianum was 3.18 at 96 h (Nampoothiri et al 2004). The differences in chitinase yields are related to fermenter design, specifically aeration and humidification suitable for growth (Yoyi et al 2004) and also the difference in the procedures and substrate used for chitinase assays.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other methods, such as cell immobilization, biphasic cell systems, and solid-state fermentations have been used for improving chitinase production from different microorganisms. Also, process conditions of the culture and its optimization can determine an increase in the productive performance of the microorganisms (Pandey et al 2000;Liu et al 2003;Brand et al 2004;Matsumoto et al 2004;Nampoothiri et al 2004;Binod et al 2005;Dahiya et al 2005b;Nawani and Kapadnis 2005;Patidar et al 2005;Gohel et al 2006).…”
Section: Process Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Applications Tomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Esta capacidad quitinolítica fue además estudiada por Binoda, en catorce cepas de Penicillium sp usando un medio mixto con salvado de trigo y quitina para la producción de quitinasa extracelular. La mejor cepa productora de quitinasas fue Penicillium aculeatum NRRL 2129 (ATCC 10409), con un tiempo de producción de 72 h. (26,27) Análisis fisicoquímico de las muestras de suelo, en relación con los hongos aislados Las 3 muestras de cada finca (El Cerezo, Tapias Negras y Sibaté) fueron sometidas a valoración fisicoquímica (resultados no mostrados). Los análi-sis fueron realizados en el laboratorio de suelos de la facultad de Ciencias Agrarias de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia.…”
Section: Actividad Quitinolíticaunclassified