2008
DOI: 10.1139/x07-188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product attributes affecting consumer preference for residential deck materials

Abstract: Abstract:In many countries, restrictions on the use of traditional preservative treatments have resulted in efforts to develop wood products for outdoor use that are durable, environmentally friendly, and appealing to consumers. In the present study, consumers' preferences for wooden deck materials were investigated using sensory analysis. The analysis included an analytical sensory profiling of five deck materials, conducted by a trained sensory panel, as well as a hedonic preference study conducted on Norweg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In various interview studies in Scandinavia, Broman [1] found that differing preferences existed among people and that the most decisive characteristics of a wood surface were the presence of mismatching features and the overall mixture of features. Similar to those findings, Nyrud et al [4] concluded that consumers prefer wood surfaces with homogenous visual appearance when they investigated the attributes influencing preference for residential decks made of different wood materials. Høibø and Nyrud [5] studied the relationships between preference and visual homogeneity of wood surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In various interview studies in Scandinavia, Broman [1] found that differing preferences existed among people and that the most decisive characteristics of a wood surface were the presence of mismatching features and the overall mixture of features. Similar to those findings, Nyrud et al [4] concluded that consumers prefer wood surfaces with homogenous visual appearance when they investigated the attributes influencing preference for residential decks made of different wood materials. Høibø and Nyrud [5] studied the relationships between preference and visual homogeneity of wood surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Yet so far, only a limited number of studies have investigated the aesthetic perception of wood and the relationships between people's preference and visible wood properties (e.g. Broman [1], Bumgardner et al [2], Donovan and Nicholls [3], Nyrud et al [4], Høibø and Nyrud [5], Nicholls and Barber [6]). In various interview studies in Scandinavia, Broman [1] found that differing preferences existed among people and that the most decisive characteristics of a wood surface were the presence of mismatching features and the overall mixture of features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Configuring the floor samples out of single boards was carried out in a way to achieve an optically balanced image within the floor sample, based on earlier findings regarding visual homogeneity (Nyrud 2008) and the avoidance of mismatching features (Broman 1995b). It can be expected that making floor samples with the same boards but in different composition with regard to the position of the boards to each other may lead to a different visual judgement by the consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only few studies which link individual appearance of surfaces to consumers' preferences. Nyrud (2008) found that wood surfaces should have a homogeneous visual appearance. Broman (1995b) found that diverging/mismatching wood features are more important for people's evaluation than the overall look of a wood surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'contrast' in Broman (2001), 'harmony' in Sande and Nyrud (2008) and Broman (2001), 'vividness' in Nordvik et al (2009) and (syn. lively) Broman (2001), 'evenness' in Nyrud et al (2008), Høibø and Nyrud (2010) and Broman (2003), 'number of knots' in Wang et al (2004) and Høibø and Nyrud (2010), 'dots' in Broman (1995). The item 'stripes' The first figure represents the results from hierarchical cluster analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%