2002
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74441-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Producer Breeding Objectives and Optimal Sire Selection

Abstract: Information from an online survey of dairy producers was used to determine how important producers perceived three different objectives in the breeding problem. The objectives were: maximizing expected net merit of the progeny, minimizing the expected progeny inbreeding coefficient, and minimizing semen expenditure. Producers were asked to rank the three objectives and then to weight the importance of each objective relative to the others. This information was then used to determine weights to be used in a mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies about incorporating farmers' preferences into breeding objectives have been published (Tozer and Stokes, 2002). The first step in our procedure was to translate the broad trait categories used by farmers to describe performance of their animals into traits that could be measured and included in the selection index.…”
Section: Selection Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies about incorporating farmers' preferences into breeding objectives have been published (Tozer and Stokes, 2002). The first step in our procedure was to translate the broad trait categories used by farmers to describe performance of their animals into traits that could be measured and included in the selection index.…”
Section: Selection Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About this issue, see Section . References to mean value‐stochastic goal programming are, among others, those of Weihua et al (), Tozer and Stokes (), Bordley and Kirkwood (), Sahoo and Biswal (), Ben Abdelaziz et al (), Muñoz and Ruiz (), Abdelaziz et al (), Bravo and González (), Chen and Hung (), and Muñoz et al ().…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…About this issue, see Section 3. References to mean valuestochastic goal programming are, among others, those of Weihua et al (2001), Tozer and Stokes (2002), Bordley and Kirkwood (2004), Sahoo and Biswal (2005) multi-objective programming (Steuer et al, 2005); (v) constructing equity mutual funds portfolios by goal programming (Pendaraki et al, 2004); (vi) meansemivariance efficient frontier (Ballestero, 2005b); (vii) hybrid models, neural networks and algorithms Ong et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2006); (viii) satisfaction functions are proposed to integrate the decision maker's preferences into GP models under uncertainty (Aouni et al, 2005); (ix) fuzzy techniques are useful when probability distributions are unknown (Ben Abdelaziz and Masri, 2005); and (x) portfolio selection based on Sharpe's beta is developed with and without fuzzy techniques in the studies by Bilbao et al (2006) and Ballestero et al (2009).…”
Section: References To Pave the Way For Our Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model aggregates variability from several goals and the variability matrices are weighted by the decision-maker's preferences and risk aversion coefficients relative to the goals. Papers using or referring to SGP are, among others, Tozer and Stokes (2002), Bordley and Kirkwood (2004), Sahoo and Biswal (2005). When time series of probability distributions are not explicitly known, they can be assumed to be defined by fuzzy logic (Ben Abdelaziz and Masri, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%