2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying stochastic goal programming: A case study on water use planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors of [23] propose a decision support model for state water agencies. It is the method of stochastic objective programming with two goals, one of which relates to the farm management, the other -to impact on the environment.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors of [23] propose a decision support model for state water agencies. It is the method of stochastic objective programming with two goals, one of which relates to the farm management, the other -to impact on the environment.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other problems that may be modelled in the same way as (1), we may mention reconfigurable manufacturing systems [40], distributed energy resources planning [54], water use planning [55], manufacturing planning [56], power systems planning [57][58][59] energy and reserves markets [60] and multi-product batch plant design [61].…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water use planning [55], workforce scheduling model [102], transpo nuclear generation of electricity problem [57,103] …”
Section: Applications Along the Multiobjective Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods have frequently been used to simultaneously optimize several objectives in crop planning (Tsakiris & Spiliotis, 2006;Sharma & Jana, 2009;Vivekanandan et al, 2009), water resources management (Al-zahrani & Ahmad, 2004;Bravo & Gonzalez, 2009) and agriculture planning (Alphonce, 1997). A recent progress in this context was considered fractional programming (FP) procedure with multiple objectives (Amini Fasakhodi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%