2013
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hht068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procyclical Leverage and Value-at-Risk

Abstract: The availability of credit varies over the business cycle through shifts in the leverage of financial intermediaries. Empirically, we find that intermediary leverage is negatively aligned with the banks' value-at-risk (VaR). Motivated by the evidence, we explore a contracting model that captures the observed features. Under general conditions on the outcome distribution given by Extreme Value Theory (EVT), intermediaries maintain a constant probability of default to shifts in the outcome distribution, implying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
124
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
18
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The macroeconomic variables include percentage change in the S&P 500 VIX, percentage change in the S&P 500 equity index, percentage change in Moody's Baa-rated corporate bond spreads, 36 Finding that accounting leverage is procyclical for banks that do not face binding regulatory leverage constraints raises the question of what sources other than bank regulation can contribute to procyclical leverage. One possible source is that banks could maintain capital to meet an internally imposed value-atrisk criterion (Adrian and Shin 2014). Another possible source relates to the fact that banks fund new asset purchases in repo markets by pledging assets as collateral.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macroeconomic variables include percentage change in the S&P 500 VIX, percentage change in the S&P 500 equity index, percentage change in Moody's Baa-rated corporate bond spreads, 36 Finding that accounting leverage is procyclical for banks that do not face binding regulatory leverage constraints raises the question of what sources other than bank regulation can contribute to procyclical leverage. One possible source is that banks could maintain capital to meet an internally imposed value-atrisk criterion (Adrian and Shin 2014). Another possible source relates to the fact that banks fund new asset purchases in repo markets by pledging assets as collateral.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related way in which portfolio performance relates to risk bearing capacity is through value at risk constraints, as in Adrian and Shin (2013). Theoretical treatments of VaR constraints use the wealth of the trader as a state variable.…”
Section: Value-at-risk (Var)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the increase in bank leverage raises the probability that the home sovereign will bail-out the bank's bondholders, insofar as the bank is deemed too important (or politically connected) to fail (Acharya, Drechsler & Schnabl, 2014). Second, in response to their increase in leverage, banks shed assets in an attempt to return to their target leverage ratio (Adrian & Shin, 2014). This includes cuts in loans to firms and households; the attendant credit crunch reduces economic activity (Altavilla et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%