2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21783-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procuring Usability: Experiences of Usability Testing in Tender Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conducting research involving children or other special categories (such as pupils with disabilities) requires great attention to the aforementioned issues and should follow all recent legislations and regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (European Commission, 2012), Directive 95/46/EC (European Parliament, 1995), Directive 2002/58/EC (European Parliament, 2002), and Charter of Fundamental Right (European Parliament, 2000). The study also found that the number of end users participating in the assessment of the final solution is critical in obtaining valid results (Riihiaho, 2000). However, this remains a challenge, as only 19.18% of studies used 1 to 20 end users to evaluate the application, 20.55% used 21 to 40, 16.44% used 41 to 60, 9.59% used 61 to 80, and 21.92% used more than 80 end users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Conducting research involving children or other special categories (such as pupils with disabilities) requires great attention to the aforementioned issues and should follow all recent legislations and regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (European Commission, 2012), Directive 95/46/EC (European Parliament, 1995), Directive 2002/58/EC (European Parliament, 2002), and Charter of Fundamental Right (European Parliament, 2000). The study also found that the number of end users participating in the assessment of the final solution is critical in obtaining valid results (Riihiaho, 2000). However, this remains a challenge, as only 19.18% of studies used 1 to 20 end users to evaluate the application, 20.55% used 21 to 40, 16.44% used 41 to 60, 9.59% used 61 to 80, and 21.92% used more than 80 end users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When the evaluation was done, all results of the usability interface will be collected and reported. In addition, heuristic assessment can improve the validity of the construction during the software development [18].…”
Section: Heuristic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items in each construct were measured in five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree).To identify the problem of the courseware, the CPRF was used. The CPRF was adapted from [18], [39]. In this study, web based environment was used in developing the courseware.…”
Section: Research Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority had never operated a tablet before and only received a short introduction of a few minutes before they had to perform the assigned tasks under the scrutiny of 2 observers. Observer effects and the think-aloud protocol are known to decrease performance for complex tasks in usability studies [36][37][38]. It is plausible that the participants would have performed better in the privacy of their own home where they feel more free from prying eyes.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%