1988
DOI: 10.1002/pen.760282111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing‐morphology relationships of compatibilized polyolefin/polyamide blends. Part I: The effect of an lonomer compatibilizer on blend morphology

Abstract: The morphology of compatibilized polyolefin/polyamide blends was found to be significantly dependent on the concentration of a n ionomer compatibilizer (polyethylenemethacrylic acid-isobutyl acrylate terpolymer) in the blend. For a dispersed phase content of 10% by weight, a maximum reduction in phase size was observed when only 0.5% by weight of ionomer was added to the blend. A more significant reduction of the dispersed phase size was observed when the minor phase was nylon, due to interactions which exist … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
112
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(19 reference statements)
8
112
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An incompatible blend, characterized by no interaction between phases, frequently exhibits interlayer slip that promotes a reduction of the torque of the blend. 31 Thus, this suggests that the compatibility of RHDPE with the clay was very poor since the equilibrium torque of RHDPE/clay was about half of that of neat RHDPE. The fact that the torque of the compatibilized blends was obviously increased suggests that there was much less slippage at the interface, and the compatibilization between RHDPE and clay was improved with the addition of MAPE and CAPS compatibilizers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An incompatible blend, characterized by no interaction between phases, frequently exhibits interlayer slip that promotes a reduction of the torque of the blend. 31 Thus, this suggests that the compatibility of RHDPE with the clay was very poor since the equilibrium torque of RHDPE/clay was about half of that of neat RHDPE. The fact that the torque of the compatibilized blends was obviously increased suggests that there was much less slippage at the interface, and the compatibilization between RHDPE and clay was improved with the addition of MAPE and CAPS compatibilizers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been schematically shown in Figure 6(b). Willis and Favis 27 reported an increase of viscosity upon the addition of a compatibilizer in immiscible binary blends. In the case of an incompatible blend, due to the presence of a sharp interface and poor interaction between the homopolymer phases, there occurs a high extent of inter layer slippage between the phases.…”
Section: Effect Of Compatibilizer Loading On Viscosity and Extrudate mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Acting as polymeric surfactants, also called emulsifiers or interfacial modifiers [17], these reduce the interfacial tension, thus promoting interfacial adhesion between the matrix and the dispersed phase. In some cases, the emulsifying ability of the compatibilizer also leads to a reduction of the polydispersity of the filler particle size [18]. Better dispersion and adhesion result in improved mechanical properties of these blends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%