The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing gain and noise in multi-electrode impedance cytometers: Comprehensive electrical design methodology and characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-electrode impedance sensors provide multiple peaks and unique signatures for single cells and particles, and have been exploited e.g. to increase the signal-to-noise ratio 35 or maximize the throughput via multiplexing. 36 Our chip layout is designed so that the signal trace is a fingerprint from which a new metric encoding for particle trajectory height is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-electrode impedance sensors provide multiple peaks and unique signatures for single cells and particles, and have been exploited e.g. to increase the signal-to-noise ratio 35 or maximize the throughput via multiplexing. 36 Our chip layout is designed so that the signal trace is a fingerprint from which a new metric encoding for particle trajectory height is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, noise also increased with increased number of electrodes, which resulted in no S/N improvement. Nevertheless, this method provided unique signatures improving the accuracy of detection .…”
Section: Principle and Design Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the vast literature (reviewed in [37] up to 2010), single-cell IFC has not yet reached the same maturity and diffusion of ECIS. From the analysis of recent advances in the field of single-cell detection [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], the following trends can be highlighted. (1) Smarter and more robust event detection algorithms are emerging.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Smarter and more robust event detection algorithms are emerging. Instead of simply fixing a threshold on the impedance value exceeded by the resistive pulse for each passage, digital segmentation and autocorrelation leveraging the odd symmetry of differential pulses can be used [44], as well as multielectrode structures that, while increasing the input capacitance and the measurement time, produce specific signatures, whose shape can be better identified against noise [45] or improved electrode layout [46]. (2) Combination of IFC with dielectrophoresis (DEP) is increasing for sorting [47], trapping [48], orienting [49], and sensing [50].…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%