2018
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201800978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistive pulse sensing as particle counting and sizing method in microfluidic systems: Designs and applications review

Abstract: Resistive pulse sensing is a well‐known and established method for counting and sizing particles in ionic solutions. Throughout its development the technique has been expanded from detection of biological cells to counting nanoparticles and viruses, and even registering individual molecules, e.g., nucleotides in nucleic acids. This technique combined with microfluidic or nanofluidic systems shows great potential for various bioanalytical applications, which were hardly possible before microfabrication gained t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a tunable pore size increases the dynamic range of a pore, the tunability requires pre-calibration and stress relaxation can hamper reproducibility [22,23]. Also, MRPS controls flow of sample through the nanoconstriction using controlled pressure, limits clogging of the nanoconstriction during measurements using embedded pre-filters, measures flow rates directly from transit time without advance need for calibration, and expands the measurable range of concentrations [24]. A detailed explanation of the differences between MRPS and TRPS can be found in the (see S3 File).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a tunable pore size increases the dynamic range of a pore, the tunability requires pre-calibration and stress relaxation can hamper reproducibility [22,23]. Also, MRPS controls flow of sample through the nanoconstriction using controlled pressure, limits clogging of the nanoconstriction during measurements using embedded pre-filters, measures flow rates directly from transit time without advance need for calibration, and expands the measurable range of concentrations [24]. A detailed explanation of the differences between MRPS and TRPS can be found in the (see S3 File).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [19] provides a review of the principle of particle analysis from impedance information. Optical detection particle counters based on the optical density [21], microscopic detection by image processing [22], or electrical detection based on the real time electrical signals [23] (i.e., voltage, current, or impedance) have been developed and studied. As shown in Figure 4, the device was packaged from two independent PDMS layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can thus obtain measurements of the concentration of nanoparticles as a function of nanoparticle size, directly from the temporal record of electrical resistance. This is a well-established technique, with the Coulter counter being the most commonly-used automated instrument for particle analysis (Vaclavek et al, 2019). At present, there are two commercially-available RPS instruments for counting and sizing EVs, the qNano (Izon Science Limited, New Zealand) and the nCS1 TM (Spectradyne LLC, Torrance, CA, USA; Vaclavek et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a well-established technique, with the Coulter counter being the most commonly-used automated instrument for particle analysis (Vaclavek et al, 2019). At present, there are two commercially-available RPS instruments for counting and sizing EVs, the qNano (Izon Science Limited, New Zealand) and the nCS1 TM (Spectradyne LLC, Torrance, CA, USA; Vaclavek et al, 2019). The qNano instrument expands RPS technique to a broader range of particle diameters by using an elastic pore that can be stretched, an approach known as Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing (TRPS; Weatherall and Willmott, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%