2013
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2013.772220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing fluency, positive affect, and judgments of meaning in life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research finds a strong correlation between meaning in life scores and perceived ease of completing the measure (although this link was moderated by religiosity; Davis & Hicks, 2016). Germane to this research is work on cognitive disfluency's effect on perceptions of meaning in life (Trent, Lavelock, & King, 2013). When reading statements on meaning-in-life inventory that were written in either disfluent font (e.g., five different fonts per item; very small print) or more fluent, easy-to-read font (e.g., large 48-point font), participants' meaning-in-life ratings were significantly higher for individuals given easy-to-read fonts compared to the disfluent fonts.…”
Section: Primary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other research finds a strong correlation between meaning in life scores and perceived ease of completing the measure (although this link was moderated by religiosity; Davis & Hicks, 2016). Germane to this research is work on cognitive disfluency's effect on perceptions of meaning in life (Trent, Lavelock, & King, 2013). When reading statements on meaning-in-life inventory that were written in either disfluent font (e.g., five different fonts per item; very small print) or more fluent, easy-to-read font (e.g., large 48-point font), participants' meaning-in-life ratings were significantly higher for individuals given easy-to-read fonts compared to the disfluent fonts.…”
Section: Primary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…That is, participants would ostensibly have a more difficult time reading these manipulated fonts and would have to engage with the items more strenuously in the critical thinking condition than in the control condition. Such disfluency manipulations are common to directly foster critical thinking and reduce intuitive judgments (Alter et al, 2007;Gervais & Norenzayan, 2012;Trent et al, 2013). Therefore, to be consistent with previous research, we did not utilize a direct manipulation check.…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Personal-nostalgia inductions typically (Batcho, 2013;Cheung et al, 2013 rather than by increasing work meaning? This is a pertinent question in light of evidence that (dispositional) PA is correlated with meaning in life (Hicks, Trent, Davis, & King, 2012;King, Hicks, Krull, & Del Gaiso, 2006;Trent, Lavelock, & King, 2013;Steger et al, 2013).…”
Section: Study 2: Testing the Effect Of Organizational Nostalgia On Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of the current studies is that the correlational designs preclude us from making any causal inferences regarding the relationships between the variables. There is reason to believe that both MIL and religiousness directly influence MIL ease, and the experience of ease directly influences judgments of meaning and religion (e.g., Gervais & Norenzayan, ; Trent et al., ). In our view, these potential causal pathways are not incompatible.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Schlegel et al (2011) found that the ease of thinking about an important source of meaning, one's "true self," predicted selfreports of meaning in life (see also Schlegel, Hicks, Davis, Hirsch, & Smith, 2013). Trent, Lavelock, and King (2013) directly manipulated the fluency of a MIL questionnaire by displaying the items in easy-to-read (fluent condition) or difficult-to-read (disfluent condition) fonts. Participants who completed the questionnaire in an easy-to-read font reported higher levels of MIL than those who completed the questionnaire in a difficult-to-read font.…”
Section: Metacognition and Subjective Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%