Silicon Analog Components 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15085-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 5(c) and (d) illustrates the variation of g m and g m /I ds with respect to gate voltage and drain current respectively. It clearly shows that in the subthreshold region, g m is constant with respect to V gs or in other way g m varies linearly with drain current, but its dependence is square root in strong inversion region [28]. It is clear from figure 3(b) that the differential change in I ds for t fe = 22 nm is higher than that of at t fe = 24 nm, for the same change in V gs around 0.9 V. Therefore, at V gs = 0.9 V the transconductance is 11.25 mS and 6.25 mS for t fe equals to 22 nm and 24 nm respectively, which is shown in figure 5(c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Figures 5(c) and (d) illustrates the variation of g m and g m /I ds with respect to gate voltage and drain current respectively. It clearly shows that in the subthreshold region, g m is constant with respect to V gs or in other way g m varies linearly with drain current, but its dependence is square root in strong inversion region [28]. It is clear from figure 3(b) that the differential change in I ds for t fe = 22 nm is higher than that of at t fe = 24 nm, for the same change in V gs around 0.9 V. Therefore, at V gs = 0.9 V the transconductance is 11.25 mS and 6.25 mS for t fe equals to 22 nm and 24 nm respectively, which is shown in figure 5(c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Interface traps originate from a lattice mismatch between SiO 2 and SiC and incomplete oxidation, including dangling bonds of Si and carbon (C), and Ccontaining defects [21,57]. A SiO 2 /Si interfacial transition layer is about 0.5-1 nm thick [58], whereas a SiC/SiO 2 interfacial transition layer is around several nanometers thick and related to oxidation and POA process [5,59,60].…”
Section: Interface Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the change in Q f was disregarded during stress and the measurement periods. Thus, ΔV fb, shift can be written as [18,36] ∆V fb, shift = −…”
Section: Charge Separation Of V Fb Shift Induced By Varied Temperatur...mentioning
confidence: 99%