1985
DOI: 10.1002/crq.39019851005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process and outcome in divorce mediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies analyzing audiotapes of custody mediations indicate that mediators are more effective in reaching agreement when they are more active in structuring the process, focus more on problem solving, discuss options and solutions rather than facts, and maintain flexible control (Slaikeu, Culler, Pearson, & Thoennes, 1985). More effective mediators intervene more frequently when conflict is high; have greater communication competence; shape communications in productive, agreement-oriented directions; and focus on interests.…”
Section: Process Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies analyzing audiotapes of custody mediations indicate that mediators are more effective in reaching agreement when they are more active in structuring the process, focus more on problem solving, discuss options and solutions rather than facts, and maintain flexible control (Slaikeu, Culler, Pearson, & Thoennes, 1985). More effective mediators intervene more frequently when conflict is high; have greater communication competence; shape communications in productive, agreement-oriented directions; and focus on interests.…”
Section: Process Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first work in this area was by Pearson (1982) and Pearson and Thoennes (19851, based on analyses of audiotapes of court-based mediation (see Slaikeu, Culler, Pearson, and Thoennes, 1985;Slaikeu, Pearson, Luckett, and Myers, 1985;Slaikeu, Pearson, and Thoennes, 1988). This work showed that mediators, especially those involved in cases that reached agreement, tended to be active and directive, playing a major role in structuring the process of mediation.…”
Section: Research In Family Mediation: a Review In Three Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight years later, reliable, empirical research comparing the immediate and longer-range effectiveness of different dispute resolution methods for resolving custody or divorce disputes remains quite limited (see Kressel & Pruitt, 1989;Pearson & Thoennes, 1989). Other than Pearson's empirical study of the Delaware child support mediation program, and the DMP, the few available studies (the majority from the Pearson data set) focus exclusively on child custody mediation in the court setting (Donahue, Allen, & Burrell, 1985;Donahue, Lyles & Rogan, 1989;Emery &Jackson, 1989;Emery & Wyer, 1987;Kressel, Butler-Defreitas, Forlenza & Wilcox, 1989;Pearson & Thoennes, 1984Slaikeu, Culler, Pearson, & Thoennes, 1985;Walker, 1989). In all these studies of custody mediation, the respondents concurrently used the adversarial legal system to settle disputed property and support issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%