2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process analysis of a low emissions hydrogen and steam generation technology for oil sands operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Despite the commercial success of thermal in situ processes such as SAGD and CSS, they present multiple challenges including considerable supply cost, high-energy intensity, high GHG emissions, and substantial water consumption. 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Despite the commercial success of thermal in situ processes such as SAGD and CSS, they present multiple challenges including considerable supply cost, high-energy intensity, high GHG emissions, and substantial water consumption. 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, SAGD presents the most economically viable option and is considered the most widely used in situ recovery method in Canada . Despite the commercial success of thermal in situ processes such as SAGD and CSS, they present multiple challenges including considerable supply cost, high-energy intensity, high GHG emissions, and substantial water consumption …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAGD being a thermal recovery process is extremely energy intensive as it requires handling of hot fluids across different stages of operation, e.g., ground transportation of steam from boilers to the wellhead, steam injection through the vertical well bore, maintaining the temperature of the steam chamber, and transportation of viscous heavy oil to refineries. , All of these steps are critical and direct determiners of the overall productivity and cost of production. Therefore, minimizing energy losses at every step is pivotal to the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the SAGD process. , Operational modifications aimed at reducing energy losses include the injection of a solvent intermittently with steam (solvent-assisted SAGD), , injecting noncondensable gases with steam (NCG-SAGD), , coinjecting surfactant solutions, performing foam-assisted SAGD (FA-SAGD), , and drilling injection and production wells perpendicular to each other (cross SAGD) . Alternative strategies have focused on increasing energy efficiency through improved materials selection and design without altering the basic SAGD operational process.…”
Section: Coatings and Cement Sheaths For Thermal Insulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once‐through steam generators (OTSGs) are used to generate steam for bitumen production in steam‐assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) oil recovery operations. [ 1,2 ] OTSGs involve complex multiphase flows with heat, mass, and species transfer in a high temperature and pressure environment (≈318°C, 11 MPa). A schematic of a typical OTSG system used in the SAGD oil recovery operations is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%