Procesos lingüísticos en situaciones de contacto. Parámetros y perspectivas

Ludwig, Ralph; Díaz, Norma B.; Pfänder, Stefan

doi:10.31819/9783865278913-015

Cited by 20 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…If we include the concept of perceived similarity in the definition of convergence, this reinforces the idea that the speaker plays a key role in interaction (cf. Diaz et al 2002). However, this brings us back to the question regarding the relationship between copy, convergence and contact-induced change.…”

Section: : 179)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Similarity effects in language contact

Palacios¹,

Pfänder²

2014

Congruence in Contact-Induced Language Change

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: : 179)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The choice of a grammatical construction to a communicative goal is determined accord-ing to a multitude of factors (cf. Diaz et al 2002). Most crucially, speakers draw on linguistic structures from the whole range of their (multilingual) linguistic repertoire.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Similarity effects in language contact

Palacios¹,

Pfänder²

2014

Congruence in Contact-Induced Language Change

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In effect, languages that enter into contact can be genetically similar or distinct, and be moved from the oral and/or written register. One classification of the situations in which these languages enter into contact, based on the criteria ± structural similarity of languages and ± scribality, distinguish four large groups: (a) without orality-scribality inequality, with structural similarity (e.g., Spanish-Portuguese); (b) with orality-scribality inequality, with structural similarity (e.g., written Latin-Romance languages); (c) without orality-scribality inequality, without structural similarity (e.g., Spanish-Basque; Guarani-Quechua); (d) with orality-scribality inequality, without structural similarity (e.g., Spanish-Quechua; French-Cree) (Díaz, Ludwig, & Pfänder, 2002).…”

Section: Discussion Of Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spanish as a Lingua Franca

Godenzzi¹

2006

APL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Examining Spanish as a lingua franca (LF) means exploring it within the terrain of its genetic, structural, and historic complexity. Concretely, it means relating processes and outcomes of linguistic change to specific situations of language contact and bilingualism, as well as to the role of Spanish as common vehicle of communication in economic and political contexts. This chapter focuses on recent research in Spanish as a LF, language variation, and contact linguistics. First, it considers situations where multilingual communication problems can appear: for those living in Afro-American settlements; those living in colonized and ethnically diverse territories; those living in border areas or bilingual enclaves; and those involved in transnational migration. Acquisition of Spanish by indigenous people in the context of bilingual intercultural education is also addressed here. Second, it accounts for the linguistic analysis of different forms of Spanish as a LF: spoken as a mother tongue, as a second language, or as hybridized forms. Third, the chapter considers some of the issues related to a theoretical framework for linguistic communication processes involving language contact based on a range of cases, mainly in the Americas. Other issues such as migration, urbanization, and the media are also discussed. This body of research demonstrates that approaching Spanish as a LF leads to a better understanding of the extent to which different historical and contemporary communicative circumstances produce different linguistic results with respect to development of a common medium of communication.

show abstract

“…Lipski 3 2004; Mendoza 1992). Con mayor énfasis que en Lipski, Mendoza y otros conocidos especialistas, distintos investigadores (Díaz/Ludwig/Pfänder 2002b;Ludwig 2002;Granda 2002;Ennis 2008;Pfänder et al 2009) procuran aclarar que hay otras causae que podrían estar jugando un papel importante allí, como por ejemplo el hecho de que el contacto lingüístico concierne sobre todo al ámbito del uso oral de la lengua. Independientemente de la adjudicación de causae, existe la discusión acerca de quién y cuándo hablaría o escribiría qué variedad del español en América Latina.…”

Section: Dispositivos De La Cultura Letradaunclassified

3 El español de América entre oralidad y escritura, cultura letrada y cultura popular

Ennis¹,

Pfänder²

2021

Manual Del Español en América

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Esta contribución propone un recorrido por el amplio y problemático terreno de los pares categoriales oralidad/escritura y cultura letrada/cultura popular como ejes desde los cuales pensar el estudio del español en América en su historia y en el presente. Partiendo de la base que impone la necesidad de no identificar ni yuxtaponer ambos planos -aunque sin por eso dejar de trabajar sobre lo efectiva que resulta su identificación, por parcial o falaz que sea-se ofrece un enfoque sobre esta articulación de lengua, sociedad y tecnologías de la palabra detenida en distintos hitos precisos de la historia política del español en América.

show abstract

Procesos lingüísticos en situaciones de contacto. Parámetros y perspectivas

Cited by 20 publications

References 0 publications

Similarity effects in language contact

Similarity effects in language contact

Spanish as a Lingua Franca

3 El español de América entre oralidad y escritura, cultura letrada y cultura popular

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About