2018
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-83-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedure Enabling Simulation and in-Depth Analysis of Optical Effects in Camera-Based Time-of-Flight Sensors

Abstract: This paper presents a simulation approach for Time-of-Flight cameras to estimate sensor performance and accuracy, as well as to help understanding experimentally discovered effects. The main scope is the detailed simulation of the optical signals. We use a raytracing-based approach and use the optical path length as the master parameter for depth calculations. The procedure is described in detail with references to our implementation in Zemax OpticStudio and Python. Our simulation approach supports multiple an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially global illumination (e.g., multi-object reflection/scattering ray-paths, translucent objects) and aberration effects (e.g., distortion caused by the ToF sensor's lens) are supported. Further details about the simulation procedure can be found in [2]. In the following, the Direct-ToF implementation is used to reconstruct the depth signals.…”
Section: Simulation Methods and Considered Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially global illumination (e.g., multi-object reflection/scattering ray-paths, translucent objects) and aberration effects (e.g., distortion caused by the ToF sensor's lens) are supported. Further details about the simulation procedure can be found in [2]. In the following, the Direct-ToF implementation is used to reconstruct the depth signals.…”
Section: Simulation Methods and Considered Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance information is reconstructed on a per-pixel basis either according to a four-step phase detection (correlation-based ToF) or directly from the average time-delay of the rays hitting the pixel (direct ToF). The difference between the two evaluation procedures was described previously [4], and the latter is used for this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%