1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(97)00033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems with the T-Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sizing the ductwork is applied from the assumed variables and the estimated design flow rate in every section. Although the methods are straightforward, they hardly obtain a balanced design system [46]- [48]. Moreover, the resulting designs do not consider prevailing local economic conditions.…”
Section: Conventional Methods (Non-optimization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sizing the ductwork is applied from the assumed variables and the estimated design flow rate in every section. Although the methods are straightforward, they hardly obtain a balanced design system [46]- [48]. Moreover, the resulting designs do not consider prevailing local economic conditions.…”
Section: Conventional Methods (Non-optimization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two junction nodes were included in the applied energy equation. Mathews et al [46] find that using the energy equation between only two junction nodes is biased and an ineffective alternative and suggested applying it on an appropriate control volume. The latest proved, on a proper control volume, that the energy equation's application does not provide an explicit expression for the static pressure regain across a junction, in contrast to Tsal and Behls' findings.…”
Section: Conventional Methods (Non-optimization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, T-method offers poor control of flow velocity or duct diameter. When there are too many limitations, Mathews and Claassen [4] indicated that it is difficult to obtain the satisfactory optimal solution from T-method. Shiu et al [5] proposed dynamic programming method for the exhaust duct system design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathews et al [6] showed that the T-Method had a problem when calculating minor loss coefficients at junctions and crosses, because minor loss coefficients are referenced to the dynamic pressure of adjacent duct sections. Therefore, the T-Method became unstable and produced grossly oversized ducts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%