2001
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.2.277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems With Proper Completion and Accuracy of the Cause-of-Death Statement

Abstract: The reliability and accuracy of CODs remain a significant problem. Despite its limitations, the autopsy remains the best standard against which to judge premortem diagnoses. The CODs of the death certificate may be improved if death certificates are completed in conjunction with the postmortem examination and amended when the autopsy findings show a discrepancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
192
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
192
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies suggest that death from non‐cancerous causes (competing mortality) and second primary malignancies are important events in HNC52 and could provide greater insight into the biological mechanisms that underlie the associations of smoking and drinking with survival. The cause of death information on a death certificate is often inaccurate however 53. Accuracy of all‐cause mortality is solely dependent on the number of deaths identified, and is arguably a more reliable outcome measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggest that death from non‐cancerous causes (competing mortality) and second primary malignancies are important events in HNC52 and could provide greater insight into the biological mechanisms that underlie the associations of smoking and drinking with survival. The cause of death information on a death certificate is often inaccurate however 53. Accuracy of all‐cause mortality is solely dependent on the number of deaths identified, and is arguably a more reliable outcome measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems with death certificate information, including form completion errors and lack of understanding of the definitions of both cause and underlying cause of death, result in accuracy rates of about 50% [16]. In addition, certain causes of death have been shown to be more likely to be incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) classification criteria define sacroiliitis as the presence of tenderness on direct compression over the sacroiliac joint (2). The sensitivity and specificity for this definition of sacroiliitis for positive findings on MRI in our prospective cross-sectional study of 40 children with newly diagnosed juvenile SpA was 0.25 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.00-0.55) and 0.53 (IQR 0.36-0.71).…”
Section: Replymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, trained chronic disease epidemiologists in the NHS, blinded to exposure status in this analysis, have systematically determined a single cause of death as the underlying condition that resulted in death. These abstractors determined cause of death by using all available medical records (e.g., discharge summaries, imaging, clinical notes, and autopsy records) and not relying only on death certificates, which are known to misclassify the cause of death (2). These methods are a major strength of analyses in the NHS investigating chronic diseases and mortality (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation