2020
DOI: 10.3311/ppme.15022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of Ferrite Content Determination

Abstract: In this work five different methods – AC magnetometer, DC magnetometer, Feritscope, EBSD and X-ray diffraction - were compared with each other. These methods were used to determine the δ-ferrite content of samples. The limits, disadvantages and advantages of the applied methods were analyzed. The tested material was 2507 type super-duplex stainless steel. The samples were cold rolled and heat treated to modify their ferrite content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ferrite ratio was also measured with Fischer FMP30 Feritscope. The feritscope has a larger measured volume to be measured comparing to the metallographic techniques [29]. It should be noted that the feritscope measures a larger average volume, while the optical microscope provides a 2D image of a 1.7x1.7 mm area in our case.…”
Section: Fig 3 Location Of the Removed Partmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The ferrite ratio was also measured with Fischer FMP30 Feritscope. The feritscope has a larger measured volume to be measured comparing to the metallographic techniques [29]. It should be noted that the feritscope measures a larger average volume, while the optical microscope provides a 2D image of a 1.7x1.7 mm area in our case.…”
Section: Fig 3 Location Of the Removed Partmentioning
confidence: 82%