Problems of ethnocultural identity and cross-language communication

Gilazetdinova, Gelinya Kh.; Edikhanov, I.Zh.; Aminova, Almira Askhatovna

doi:10.7813/jll.2014/5-3/7

Cited by 11 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…and Mukhamedova S., Gilazetdinova G.H., Edikhanova I.D. and Aminova A.A., as well as by other scientists (Gabdrakhmanova, Sattarova, & Nurmukhametova, 2016;Gilazetdinova, Edikhanov, & Aminova, 2014;Sibgaeva, Salakhova, & Mukhamedova, 2017;Zamaletdinov & Zamaletdinova, 2010) have been particularly helpful in our research work. Pimenova (2012) notes that "The folklore image of the world forms an important, fundamental part of the conceptual picture of an ethnic group" (p. 95).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Representation Of Proverbs With Zoonyms In Tatar Linguistic View Of The World

Zamaletdinov¹,

Mugtasimova²,

Nabiullina³

et al. 2020

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Representation Of Proverbs With Zoonyms In Tatar Linguistic View Of The World

Zamaletdinov¹,

Mugtasimova²,

Nabiullina³

et al. 2020

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This issue is covered in the works of many scholars from different branches of knowledge, since the study of realities is at the junction of such scientific areas as translation studies, linguoculturology, linguistic regional studies, the history of language, sociology, etc. Among many works, let's note some devoted to the problems of ethnocultural identity and interlanguage communication (Gilazetdinova et al, 2014), the reflection of the paremiological foundation of the Tatar people in the ethnolinguistic aspect (Mugtasimova et al, 2014), the study of a man as an object of evaluation in the phraseological picture of the Tatar language world…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews eISSN: 2395-6518, Vol 7, No 6, 2019 S. Vlakhov and S. Florin define the following two main difficulties in translation of realities: 1) the lack of correspondence (equivalent, analogue) in the translated language due to the lack of native speakers of this language denoted by realities and 2) the need to convey and color (connotation) -it's national and historical coloring along with the objective meaning (semantics) realities (Gilazetdinova et al, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

National and Cultural Realias of Translations Into Tatar

Yerbulatova

Kirillova

Şahin

2019

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purposes: This article is devoted to the study of realityн translation, the identification of the main types and difficulties of translation based on the material of literary works translated from Russian into Tatar. Implication/Application: Among the objective difficulties of the works of Russian writer translation into the Tatar language, one can note the mismatch of Russian and Tatar words or phrases expressing realities. It is especially difficult to translate those words and expressions that are close in meaning, but differ in "volume". Results:The authors show the dependence of translation strategy choice on external sociocultural and pragmatic factors. The study also found out what problems may arise during the transfer of realities in translation, and the main difficulties are highlighted that arise during the translation of realities, in particular, during the absence of an equivalent, correspondence or analogue in the translated language, the need to convey not only the meaning of reality but also its color.Novelty: In our work, the essence of the realities was determined, the main aspects of reality transfer during translation were analyzed, the types of correspondences by a value between the realities, which can be grouped into three main ones, are considered: full, partial correspondence and its absence.

show abstract

“…Despite availability of numerous different Tatar dictionaries of synonyms, they do not represent all the comprehensiveness of the language. There were more than 25 thousand of words in the recent dictionary of synonyms, published in 2014 (Gilyazetdinova, Edikhanov, & Aminova, 2014). However, there is a possibility to add new words to this vocabulary.…”

Section: Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%