1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00118384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems in heathland and grassland dynamics

Abstract: A review of factors governing vegetation change in heathlands and grasslands is presented, with emphasis on soil factors. Climate, microclimate, fire, fauna, grazing by vertebrates, grazing by invertebrates, disease, dispersal, establishment, competition, allelopathy, stabilization, soil formation and podzolizati0n are discussed with emphasis on inconsistencies and lacks in our present knowledge. Examples are mainly from NW European Calluna heath and related woodlands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, when heather increases in abundance, the competition with pine seedlings intensifies and seedling mortality increases (Aaltonen 1919;Hertz 1934). Heather is known to be a strong competitor with pine seedlings (Lehto 1956), a feature that might arise from its allelopathic properties (Miles 1981;Mallik 1995). Establishment cutting, site preparation and prescribed burning are not always effective enough to control heather (Norberg et al 2001) because heather recolonizes rapidly after a disturbance (Skre et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, when heather increases in abundance, the competition with pine seedlings intensifies and seedling mortality increases (Aaltonen 1919;Hertz 1934). Heather is known to be a strong competitor with pine seedlings (Lehto 1956), a feature that might arise from its allelopathic properties (Miles 1981;Mallik 1995). Establishment cutting, site preparation and prescribed burning are not always effective enough to control heather (Norberg et al 2001) because heather recolonizes rapidly after a disturbance (Skre et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are thought to be the main factors in conifer regeneration failure and cause a "growth check" (interruption of growth) in disturbed (logging, fire etc.) habitats dominated by heather (Miles 1981). Yet, the interference mechanisms between heather and pine remain unclear (Norberg et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very young heather tends to be killed by fire. Thus, on one lowland heath in Hampshire, where only 2% of building phase heather stools failed to regenerate after a fire, on a part containing enough purple moor-grass to permit annual burning, 61% of heather stools failed to regenerate after being burnt twice in 2 consecutive years (Miles 1981).…”
Section: Purple Moor-grass 66mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these analyses, we estimated the intensity of agricultural systems on the RPLP area, which may serve as a good contribution to the search for new, more suitable and more efficient measures for achieving RPLP objectives. On the basis of an overview of national and foreign studies, we can assume the validity of the generally accepted thesis that less intensive agricultural systems have positive effects on the conservation of permanent grasslands and their ecosystem services (Kramberger, 1994;Nösberger and Rodriguez;Nösberger et al, 1994;Bignal et McCracken, 1996;Nielsen in Debosz, 1994;Zechmeister et al, 2002;Miles, 1981;Brak et al, 2004;Critchley et al, 2007;Hayes et al, 2007;Dunn et al, 2007;Gulliver et al, 2007;Buckingham and Peach, 2007, Marriot et al, 2009, Ketiš, 2010. In the second section, socio-economic analyses were carried out with an inquiry among 15 farmers in which the socio-economic and production characteristics of farms were obtained (property and size of farms, types and history of land use, grassland management practices, use of agricultural mechanisation), attitudes of farmers towards the formation of RPLP (acquaintance with reasons for park formation and mode of providing this information, knowledge of Natura 2000 areas) and reasons for not applying for the ERB and AE measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%