“…Using these analyses, we estimated the intensity of agricultural systems on the RPLP area, which may serve as a good contribution to the search for new, more suitable and more efficient measures for achieving RPLP objectives. On the basis of an overview of national and foreign studies, we can assume the validity of the generally accepted thesis that less intensive agricultural systems have positive effects on the conservation of permanent grasslands and their ecosystem services (Kramberger, 1994;Nösberger and Rodriguez;Nösberger et al, 1994;Bignal et McCracken, 1996;Nielsen in Debosz, 1994;Zechmeister et al, 2002;Miles, 1981;Brak et al, 2004;Critchley et al, 2007;Hayes et al, 2007;Dunn et al, 2007;Gulliver et al, 2007;Buckingham and Peach, 2007, Marriot et al, 2009, Ketiš, 2010. In the second section, socio-economic analyses were carried out with an inquiry among 15 farmers in which the socio-economic and production characteristics of farms were obtained (property and size of farms, types and history of land use, grassland management practices, use of agricultural mechanisation), attitudes of farmers towards the formation of RPLP (acquaintance with reasons for park formation and mode of providing this information, knowledge of Natura 2000 areas) and reasons for not applying for the ERB and AE measures.…”