1994
DOI: 10.3406/lsoc.1994.2669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problèmes méthodologiques de l'évaluation des pratiques socio-linguistiques en langues "régionales" ou "minoritaires" : l'exemple de la situation en France

Abstract: Le discours dominant déclarant moribondes les langues "régionales" de France est contredit par certaines enquêtes scientifiques et semble servir une idéologie centraliste. L'auteur montre les difficultés méthodologiques d'une enquête "objective" sur les pratiques linguistiques en situation diglossique en s'appuyant sur des observations issues de la pragmatique, de l'ethnologie et de la psychologie sociale (principe de coupure, stratégie de dissimulation/ostentation). Il propose plutôt une analyse comparative d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interviews indicate that the decision to use this category was justified. This tendency to under-report language use is reminiscent of the widely-reported phenomenon that speakers of 'patois' have tended to deny that they know the 'patois' at all (Blanchet, 1994). A recurrent theme across the majority of interviews was the desire to learn Breton for two main reasons: (1) to provide the means for cross-generational communication in Breton (especially between the informants and their grandparents) and/or (2) to reinforce Breton identity.…”
Section: Section 1 Of the Questionnaire: Use Of Breton Attitudes Andmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The interviews indicate that the decision to use this category was justified. This tendency to under-report language use is reminiscent of the widely-reported phenomenon that speakers of 'patois' have tended to deny that they know the 'patois' at all (Blanchet, 1994). A recurrent theme across the majority of interviews was the desire to learn Breton for two main reasons: (1) to provide the means for cross-generational communication in Breton (especially between the informants and their grandparents) and/or (2) to reinforce Breton identity.…”
Section: Section 1 Of the Questionnaire: Use Of Breton Attitudes Andmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…favourably regarded by some 80% of symbolic users, including non-natives (Hammel and Gardy, 1994;Moreux, 2002;Oyharçabal, 1999;Blanchet, 1992Blanchet, , 2002aBlanchet and Schiffman, 2004). 17 The varieties of French spoken in the southern third of France share noticeable similarities, mainly in pronunciation, although people from these different regions can identify the differences between them (Moreux, 1985: 97;Walter, 1982).…”
Section: A Specific Situationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All authors stress that, for intermediate cases (where neither death nor development is clearly present), any evaluation yields not definite results and predictions, but rather indications and tendencies. These restrictions are justified by specific case studies that also show the extent to which ideologies are involved (Blanchet, 1997(Blanchet, , 1998Eloy, 1998). The problem of 'dialect vitality vs. dialect death' is much more complex than a simple alternation between 'loyalty (to the dialect) vs. shift (to another variety)', where in everyday terms these are thought of as opposites.…”
Section: Eth Odolog I Cal and Conc E P Tual P Roble M Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of reliability of the quota sampling done depends on the relevancy of the variables chosen (in the present case: gender, age, socioeconomic group). Furthermore, the methodology, based on an auto-evaluation of the people questioned during brief, face-to-face or telephone interviews, is poorly adapted to the objective (Blanchet 1994). For the most part, however, the results are similar to those of field surveys.…”
Section: Linguistic Competence: Quantitative Data and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%