1985
DOI: 10.2307/3321806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problèmes empiriques de la sociologie compréhensive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This historical–discursive analysis method is a type of “ethnomethodology” for explaining the endogenous logic and meaning of a government’s public diplomacy institutionalization and evolution (Oger and Ollivier-Yaniv 2003 , p. 136). In a democratic context, public policy makers often express their intentions and strategies in visible ways (e.g., through “language games”; Pharo 1985 , p. 127). Therefore, based on the precepts of historical institutionalism and discursive institutionalism, scholars can inspect institutional changes in public diplomacy and both perceive and interpret social and rhetorical phenomena related to a government’s foreign policy implementation, mediatization, rationalization, and legitimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This historical–discursive analysis method is a type of “ethnomethodology” for explaining the endogenous logic and meaning of a government’s public diplomacy institutionalization and evolution (Oger and Ollivier-Yaniv 2003 , p. 136). In a democratic context, public policy makers often express their intentions and strategies in visible ways (e.g., through “language games”; Pharo 1985 , p. 127). Therefore, based on the precepts of historical institutionalism and discursive institutionalism, scholars can inspect institutional changes in public diplomacy and both perceive and interpret social and rhetorical phenomena related to a government’s foreign policy implementation, mediatization, rationalization, and legitimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'autres prescriptions, qualifiées de remontantes (bottom-up) par Daniellou (2002), sont issues de la confrontation des individus aux épreuves de leur travail et émanent surtout des collectifs où s'influencent les pairs pour élaborer des manières de faire, de dire et de concevoir le travail (c'est le projet également des écoles d'étables au Danemark, Vaarst et al 2006). Nous utiliserons plus volontiers la distinction endogène/exogène, qui met en exergue la capacité des éleveurs à produire eux-mêmes les prescriptions qui orientent leurs manières de travailler (Pharo 1985). Cet usage implique en effet de se réinterroger sur qui sont les pairs et en quoi ils influencent mutuellement leurs manières de travailler et plus singulièrement leurs conduites sanitaires.…”
Section: / L'influence Des Prescripteurs Sur La Construction Des Condunclassified