2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problematic internet use among older adolescents: A conceptual framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Internet addiction (6) is a relatively new form of dependency, which is under review by the scientific community. Essentially it refers to the increasing number of people who report more and more involvement with the Internet to raise the feeling of satisfaction and a systematic increase in the time spent for pumping this feeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internet addiction (6) is a relatively new form of dependency, which is under review by the scientific community. Essentially it refers to the increasing number of people who report more and more involvement with the Internet to raise the feeling of satisfaction and a systematic increase in the time spent for pumping this feeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical literature has been published examining the phenomenon from broader perspectives [69,70], as well as empiric testing models such as the addiction component model by Griffiths [71], and demonstrating distinct nosologic entities between general IA and a specific IA, such as online gaming addiction [12,72]. Other works have noted the lack of a conceptual framework, proposing their own rationale [73] or aggregating the psychosocial perspective to provide a multifactorial approach to IA [16].…”
Section: Main Findings On Internet Addiction Conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A problémás mértékű internethasználat előfordulásának gyakorisága jelentős mérték-ben változó lehet kutatásról kutatásra, köszönhetően a kultúrák közötti eltéréseknek, a jelenség eltérő definiálásának, a kritériumok és a felhasznált tesztek különbözőségének, valamint annak, hogy a kutatások döntő többsége önbevallásos kérdőívekkel, illetve eltérő mintavétellel történik, melyek kiválasztását sok esetben nem dokumentálják pontosan (Moreno, Jelenchick, & Christakis, 2013). Az előfordulása igen széles skálán mozog, vizsgálattól függően 1-36% közötti, de ezt meg is haladhatja a problémás mértékben internetezők száma (Cao, Sun, Wan, Hao, & Tao, 2011).…”
Section: Prevalencia éS Alfaktorokunclassified