How Has Internet Addiction Research Evolved Since the Advent of Internet Gaming Disorder? An Overview of Cyberaddictions from a Psychological Perspective

Abstract

During the past two decades, Internet addiction (IA) has been the most commonly used term in research into online activities and their influence on the development of behavioral addictions. The aim of this review is to assess the impact of the concept of Internet gaming disorder (IGD), proposed by the American Psychiatric Association, on the scientific literature regarding IA. It presents a bibliometric analysis of the IA literature starting from the time IGD was first proposed, with the objective of observing and comparing the topics that have arisen during this period among the different IA themes researched. The findings demonstrate a steady evolution, particularly regarding publications related to the general aspects of IA: its clinical component, its prevalence and psychometric measures, the growing interest in the contextual factors promoting this addictive behavior, scientific progress in its conceptualization based on existing theoretical models, and neuropsychological studies. Nevertheless, many of the studies (22 %) focus on specific IA behaviors and show heterogeneity among the cyberaddictions, with online gaming (related to IGD) most common, followed by cybersex and social networking. Although research on the general concept of IA continues, investigators have begun to pay attention to the diverse spectrum of specific cyberaddictions and their psychological components.

The Assessment of Problematic Internet Pornography Use: A Comparison of Three Scales with Mixed Methods

“…To date, no consensus exists regarding the conceptualization and diagnosis of problematic IPU. For instance, numerous terms have been used to describe the phenomenon (e.g., internet sex addiction [7,8], problematic online sexual activities [9], cybersex addiction [10], and problematic internet pornography use [6]). Although these concepts are slightly different, they all comprise three crucial components: the medium (the internet), the content (sexual behavior), and the problematic use (the compulsive behavior).…”

Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS)

“…Because the pervasiveness and intrusiveness of smartphones can lead to such problematic and/or compulsive use in a minority of cases, some scholars consider these habits as a behavioral dependence, and therefore a variant of technological dependence (Salehan and Negahban 2013). In fact, psychological literature describes several commonalities between maladaptive use of the internet and smartphones, including symptoms such as obsessivecompulsive behaviors (Kuss and Griffiths 2012;Kuss et al 2014;Lopez-Fernandez 2015;Kardefelt-Winther 2014b). Other scholars consider problematic smartphone use as a specific dependence, culminating in what has been called "smartphone addiction" (Kuss and Griffiths 2017).…”

The Psychometric Properties of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS)

“…The literature describes several commonalities and differences between internet and smartphone misuse, such as having similar symptoms to other forms of addiction (Kuss and Griffiths 2012 ; Kuss et al 2014 ; Lopez-Fernandez 2015 ). Currently, the terminology describing problematic smartphone use is inconsistent, as evidenced by the use of the various terms including “addiction,” “excessive,” “compulsive,” “compensatory,” and “problematic” (e.g., Kardefelt-Winther 2014a , b ; Widyanto and Griffiths 2006 ).…”