2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problem structuring in participatory forest planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the uncertainty regarding the consequences of alternative policy choices, the conflict between contradictory values, and the multiplicity of people concerned about policy decisions all mean that the use of other decision-making tools is required [16]. The joint use of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) with participatory approaches (PA) (Several studies dealing with participation techniques and processes have been carried out with regard to natural resources management [13,14,29,30] and in forestry decision-making [10,31,32]) has turned out to be of paramount importance for forestry issues [8]. The combination of social techniques with MCA (Mendoza and Martins [33] carried out a review of MCDA methods that have been applied to processes related to natural resources and forests, establishing a classification of MCA methods based on a previous work of Belton and Stewart [34]) ones improves the understanding of the results from an analysis and clarifies the positions of the stakeholders involved in the process.…”
Section: Literature and Method: A Participatory Multi-criteria Framewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the uncertainty regarding the consequences of alternative policy choices, the conflict between contradictory values, and the multiplicity of people concerned about policy decisions all mean that the use of other decision-making tools is required [16]. The joint use of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) with participatory approaches (PA) (Several studies dealing with participation techniques and processes have been carried out with regard to natural resources management [13,14,29,30] and in forestry decision-making [10,31,32]) has turned out to be of paramount importance for forestry issues [8]. The combination of social techniques with MCA (Mendoza and Martins [33] carried out a review of MCDA methods that have been applied to processes related to natural resources and forests, establishing a classification of MCA methods based on a previous work of Belton and Stewart [34]) ones improves the understanding of the results from an analysis and clarifies the positions of the stakeholders involved in the process.…”
Section: Literature and Method: A Participatory Multi-criteria Framewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors proposed the use of SODA to support definition of impact categories in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment -LCSA. Khadka et al (2013) review the use of PSM in participatory forest planning, and they suggested the use of SODA to support such decisions. Mulliner et al (2013) proposes the use of SODA methodology to determine relevant criteria and alternatives for assessment of sustainable housing affordability.…”
Section: Cognitive Maps and Tree Of Fundamental Viewpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and of its effects on the forest sector. The workshop was also structured to enhance knowledge exchange between individuals acting at different levels of forest management, facilitating group learning and enabling better adaptation capacity in the forest sector, similar to problem-structuring methods (Khadka et al 2013). Benefitting from participants' inputs, experiences and context, we were able to assess shared elements (as well as those that are biome specific) in terms of perceived barriers and elements favouring adaptation.…”
Section: Workhop Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%