Participatory Multi-Criteria Assessment of Forest Planning Policies in Conflicting Situations: The Case of Tenerife

Acosta, Montserrat; Quintana, Serafín Corral

doi:10.3390/f6113946

Cited by 20 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The degree of similarity defines the number of coalitions among stakeholders depending on their preferences with respect to the alternatives (i.e., the lowest similarity index outcome is just one coalition and the highest can be equal to the number of stakeholders). In line with other researches in this field [53,56,57,84,107], in our case the coalition dendrogram has been calculated for a similarity index of 0.68, whose outcome is shown in Table 17.…”

Section: Social Evaluation: Narrowing the Conflict Analysissupporting

confidence: 59%

“…All these phases have involved the participation of the stakeholders and have been developed in an iterative manner, thus allowing their feedback in terms of information and decision making throughout the process. are works carried out both in the field of territorial planning [50][51][52][53] as well as in the agrarian and forestry sector [54][55][56][57], the two areas on which our case study is focused.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The planning of rural land depends, to a large extent, on the agreed-upon agrarian and forestry development model. Within the framework of agrarian multifunctionality, to evaluate different development alternatives and their effect on territorial planning, its multiple dimensions must be considered as well as the interests and needs of the stakeholders. This work thus addresses the comprehensive evaluation of development alternatives for the rural area of a municipality of the Basque Country (Spain) through the implementation of a multi-criteria evaluation method with social participation. The results show, firstly, the existence of trade-offs between the functions to be promoted in the various development models evaluated. Secondly, the results indicate the need to reverse recent trends in the sector and the convenience of moving towards an agro-livestock model of greater ecological and local character, independently of the followed forest model. In fact, the evaluation carried out also reveals, thirdly, the existence of more or less latent conflicts, in particular with regards to forest policy.

show abstract

Section: Social Evaluation: Narrowing the Conflict Analysissupporting

confidence: 59%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our case, the coalition dendrogram has been calculated for a degree of similarity of 0.68, in line with other investigations in this field [44,48,49,67,85].…”

Section: Social Evaluation: Narrowing the Conflict Analysissupporting

confidence: 83%

“…It should be noted that the SMCE is a robust and contrasted method, whose usefulness and applicability has been demonstrated in the many real cases in which it has been applied. Among these cases, there are works carried out both in the field of territorial planning [42][43][44][45] as well as in the agrarian and forestry sector [46][47][48][49], the two areas to which our case study is focused on.…”

Section: Rural Planning Through the Smcementioning

confidence: 99%

Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-criteria Evaluation

Barinaga-Rementeria¹,

Etxano²,

Garcia³

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The planning of rural land depends to a large extent on the agrarian and forestry development model agreed upon for it. Within the framework of agrarian multifunctionality, to evaluate different development alternatives and their effect on territorial planning, its multiple dimensions must be considered as well as the interests and needs of the stakeholders. This work thus addresses the comprehensive evaluation of development alternatives for the rural area of a municipality of the Basque Country (Spain) through the implementation of a multi-criteria evaluation method with social participation. The results show, firstly, the existence of trade-offs between the functions to be promoted in the various development models evaluated. Secondly, the results indicate the need to reverse recent trends in the sector and the convenience of moving towards an agro-livestock model of greater ecological and local character, independently of the followed forest model. In fact, the evaluation carried out also reveals, thirdly, the existence of more or less latent conflicts, in particular with regards to forest policy.

show abstract

“…In [19], authors integrate multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning. Authors in [20] propose a participatory multi-criteria assessment of forest planning policies in conflicting situations. An empirical study on voting power in participatory forest planning is proposed in [21].…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Users Integrity Constraints in SOLAP Systems. Application in Agroforestry

Charef¹,

Djamila²

2018

IJIMAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SpatialData Warehouse and Spatial On-Line Analytical Processing are decision support technologies which offer the spatial and multidimensional analysis of data stored in multidimensional structure. They are aimed also at supporting geographic knowledge discovery to help decision-maker in his job related to make the appropriate decision . However, if we don't consider data quality in the spatial hypercubes and how it is explored, it may provide unreliable results. In this paper, we propose a system for the implementation of user integrity constraints in SOLAP namely "UIC-SOLAP". It corresponds to a methodology for guaranteeing results quality in an analytical process effectuated by different users exploiting several facts tables within the same hypercube. We integrate users Integrity Constraints (IC) by specifying visualization ICs according to their preferences and we define inter-facts ICs in this case. In order to validate our proposition, we propose the multidimensional modeling by UML profile to support constellation schema of a hypercube with several fact tables related to subjects of analysis in forestry management. Then, we propose implementation of some ICs related to users of such a system.

show abstract

Participatory Multi-Criteria Assessment of Forest Planning Policies in Conflicting Situations: The Case of Tenerife

Cited by 20 publications

References 37 publications

Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation

Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation

Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-criteria Evaluation

Users Integrity Constraints in SOLAP Systems. Application in Agroforestry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About