2012
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2012.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problem solving in MNCs: How local and global solutions are (and are not) created

Abstract: It is widely acknowledged in the international business literature that subsidiaries can make a strategic contribution to multinational corporations (MNCs). Departing from the common focus on subsidiary role, contexts and organizational MNC factors, this study explores the micro-level details of managers' actions and interactions. We conducted an in-depth qualitative study into 38 problem-solving processes employed across four subsidiaries. Taking a non-routine problem-solving perspective on how subsidiaries c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(134 reference statements)
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Charged with translating the wishes of the organization into action, the subsidiary manager is, similarly to other middle managers, an influential actor who must "mediate, negotiate, and interpret connections" (Floyd & Wooldridge, 1997, p. 466), champion alternatives (Floyd & Wooldridge, 1992;Mantere, 2008), seize opportunities (Burgelman, 1994), search for solutions to complex problems (Tippmann, Sharkey Scott, & Mangematin, 2012), encourage and integrate divergent views (Beck & Plowman, 2009), and shape strategy (Balogun & Johnson, 2005;Browne, Sharkey-Scott, Mangematin, Lawlor, & Cuddihy, 2014;Wooldridge, Floyd, & Schmid, 2008). Floyd and Wooldridge's (1992) seminal typology captures the vertical relationships of such middle managers: their interactions both upward and downward through integrative and divergent activities (Aherne, Lam, & Kraus, 2014;Mom et al, 2007;Pappas & Wooldridge, 2007;Wooldridge et al, 2008).…”
Section: Strategic Activities Of Subsidiary Managers For Initiativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charged with translating the wishes of the organization into action, the subsidiary manager is, similarly to other middle managers, an influential actor who must "mediate, negotiate, and interpret connections" (Floyd & Wooldridge, 1997, p. 466), champion alternatives (Floyd & Wooldridge, 1992;Mantere, 2008), seize opportunities (Burgelman, 1994), search for solutions to complex problems (Tippmann, Sharkey Scott, & Mangematin, 2012), encourage and integrate divergent views (Beck & Plowman, 2009), and shape strategy (Balogun & Johnson, 2005;Browne, Sharkey-Scott, Mangematin, Lawlor, & Cuddihy, 2014;Wooldridge, Floyd, & Schmid, 2008). Floyd and Wooldridge's (1992) seminal typology captures the vertical relationships of such middle managers: their interactions both upward and downward through integrative and divergent activities (Aherne, Lam, & Kraus, 2014;Mom et al, 2007;Pappas & Wooldridge, 2007;Wooldridge et al, 2008).…”
Section: Strategic Activities Of Subsidiary Managers For Initiativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, we suggest that MNC knowledge transformation enables opportunity formation as it modifies the contributions of collaborators across pragmatic boundaries within MNCs to generate new problem formulations. Subsidiary driven problem solving can exhibit strong tendencies to formulate problems within local and context‐specific constraints (Tippmann et al, ). The value of MNC knowledge transformation in breaking out of such narrow and habitual problem formulation can be illustrated with an example of an atypical situation experienced by one of the organizations that participated in our study, a French subsidiary.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyse our data through the inductive technique outlined by Corley and Gioia (2004) and recently adopted in international business studies (e.g., Tippmann, Scott, & Mangematin, 2012). The first stage of data analysis takes place in parallel with the data collection and consists of fracturing each interview into accounts of specific internationalisation events since firm inception.…”
Section: Data Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%