2004
DOI: 10.1177/0255761404042375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problem-Solving and Creativity: Insights from Students’ Individual Composing Pathways

Abstract: Music educators are particularly keen to offer learning opportunities that enhance creativity. How this happens remains something of a mystery. Within an international context, this article reports on a study that used a cross-cultural perspective on creative thinking with a particular focus on examining the link between problem-solving and composing. The study compares the individual composing pathways of a sample of students drawn from a range of data sets that tracked students’ thinking as they composed, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also supports suggestions that practitioners need appropriate composing experience if they are to both assess work from a range of styles (Pilsbury and Alston, 1996) and engage with the students' composing processes (Berkley, 2001). These processes are not homogenous and the results from this enquiry corroborate observations from other studies regarding the influence of the music style and the students' individual differences on the composing processes (Burnard and Younker, 2004;Folkestad, 2004;Green, 1990;Seddon and O'Neill, 2003;Soares, 2006). All these recent studies exemplify the complexity of creativity in music education, which is not always reflected in teaching manuals and statutory guidelines.…”
Section: Conclusion: Educational Implications and Issues For Furthersupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It also supports suggestions that practitioners need appropriate composing experience if they are to both assess work from a range of styles (Pilsbury and Alston, 1996) and engage with the students' composing processes (Berkley, 2001). These processes are not homogenous and the results from this enquiry corroborate observations from other studies regarding the influence of the music style and the students' individual differences on the composing processes (Burnard and Younker, 2004;Folkestad, 2004;Green, 1990;Seddon and O'Neill, 2003;Soares, 2006). All these recent studies exemplify the complexity of creativity in music education, which is not always reflected in teaching manuals and statutory guidelines.…”
Section: Conclusion: Educational Implications and Issues For Furthersupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Researchers have been concerned with the processes by which people-and especially pupils-engage in musical creative activities of composition (e.g. Burnard, 2006;Burnard & Younker, 2004) and improvisation (e.g. Kratus, 1995;Tafuri, 2006).…”
Section: Creativity In Music Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The settings of these previous are summarized as follows (see Table 1). (For specifics about each case, see Burnard & Younker, 2004 3.1. Introducing the tasks…”
Section: Understanding Interaction Through Analysis Of Activity Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%