2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-05617-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probit in a Spatial Context: A Monte Carlo Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
130
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two dominant techniques, both based on simulation methods, for the estimation of the spatial lag model are the frequentist recursive importance sampling (RIS) estimator (which is a generalization of the more familiar GewekeHajivassiliou-Keane or GHK simulator; see Beron et al, 2003 andVijverberg, 2004) and The next section presents the model formulation for both the spatial lag and spatial error structures, while Section 3.2 discusses model estimation.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two dominant techniques, both based on simulation methods, for the estimation of the spatial lag model are the frequentist recursive importance sampling (RIS) estimator (which is a generalization of the more familiar GewekeHajivassiliou-Keane or GHK simulator; see Beron et al, 2003 andVijverberg, 2004) and The next section presents the model formulation for both the spatial lag and spatial error structures, while Section 3.2 discusses model estimation.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recursive importance sampling algorithm was applied to calculate the n -dimensional integral in the likelihood function and thus estimate the parameters in the spatial probit model. This method uses random draws of truncated normal distributions (Beron and Vijverberg 2004). This simulator is one of the most efficient techniques for estimating the likelihood function (Pace and LeSage 2011).…”
Section: Spatial Probit Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beron et al (2003) and Beron and Vijverberg (2004) A problem with the approaches just discussed is that they are not feasible for moderate-tolarge samples since they require the inversion and determinant computation of a square matrix of the order of the number of observational units (for McMillen's EM method, LeSage's MCMC method, and Pinkse and Slade's heteroscedastic approach), or treat spatial dependence as a nuisance with no provision of an estimate of the standard error of the spatial error parameter (for the GMM method described in Fleming, 2004), or require the simulation of a multidimensional integral of the order of the number of observational units (for the RIS-based method). 2 Another possible approach is to maintain a relatively restrictive spatial correlation structure that allows a constant correlation within observational units in pre-specified spatial regions, but no correlation in observational units in different spatial regions.…”
Section: Discrete Choice Models With Spatial Error Autocorrelationmentioning
confidence: 99%