2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.111.247202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Spin Pumping Mechanism: Exchange Coupling with Exponential Decay inY3Fe5O12/Barrier/PtHeterostructures

Abstract: Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) driven spin pumping of pure spin currents from a ferromagnet (FM) into a nonmagnetic material (NM) promises new spin-functional devices with low energy consumption [1-6]. The mechanism of spin pumping is under intense investigation and it is widely believed that exchange interaction between the FM and NM is responsible for this phenomenon [2-5, 7]. We observe a thousand-fold exponential decay of the spin pumping from 20-nm thick Y 3 Fe 5 O 12 (YIG) films to platinum across insulat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
48
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16] In this Letter, we report investigation of FMR spin pumping from YIG epitaxial films to Py, Fe, Co, and Ni, either in direct contacts or through a Cu spacer. The large spin pumping signals enabled by our YIG films 8,9 allow for quantitative understanding of pure spin currents in various FM metals and detection of the spin currents by inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] In this Letter, we report investigation of FMR spin pumping from YIG epitaxial films to Py, Fe, Co, and Ni, either in direct contacts or through a Cu spacer. The large spin pumping signals enabled by our YIG films 8,9 allow for quantitative understanding of pure spin currents in various FM metals and detection of the spin currents by inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spin current injected into the NM layer is J S ¼ ft NM σ NM =½Θ SH λ NM tanhðt NM =2λ NM ÞgðV ISHE =LÞ, where σ NM , t NM , Θ SH , λ NM are the conductivity, the thickness, the spin Hall angle, and the spin diffusion length of the NM layer, respectively [21]. Then, we have J S ¼ ft NM σ NM = ½Θ SH λ NM tanhðt NM =2λ NM ÞgðSΔT=t YIG Þ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use off-axis sputtering [9,[14][15][16][20][21][22][23]] to deposit 90 nm thick Sr 2 CrReO 6 (001) films on (LaAlO 3 ) 0.3 (Sr 2 AlTaO 6 ) 0.7 (LSAT), SrTiO 3 (STO), and a relaxed SrCr 0.5 Nb 0.5 O 3 (SCNO) buffer layer on LSAT with lattice constants a = 3.868Å, 3.905Å and 3.946Å, respectively (see Supplemental Material for growth parameters). As a comparison, the pseudocubic lattice constants of bulk Sr 2 CrReO 6 are a p = 3.907Å and c p = 3.905Å [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%