2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.101302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Largest Scale Structure in the Universe with Polarization Map of Galaxy Clusters

Abstract: We introduce a new formalism to describe the polarization signal of galaxy clusters on the whole sky. We show that a sparsely sampled, half-sky map of the cluster polarization at z 1 would allow us to better characterize the very large scale density fluctuations. While the horizon length is smaller in the past, two other competing effects significantly remove the contribution of the small scale fluctuations from the quadrupole polarization pattern at z 1. For the standard CDM universe with vanishing tensor mod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a decrease in power is expected to make slight modifications to the polarization signal and to result in a lower polarization signal at large angular scales than assumed with no modifications to the primordial spectrum (e.g., Cline et al 2003). In fact, CMB polarization towards galaxy clusters may provide a mechanism to look for the cut-off in primordial power spectrum (e.g., Seto & Pierpaoli 2005). If there is a cut-off in the spectrum at small scales, ISW signal remain unaffected and the ratio of ISW-to-SW contribution to polarization may be higher when compared to a model where large-scale power is not affected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a decrease in power is expected to make slight modifications to the polarization signal and to result in a lower polarization signal at large angular scales than assumed with no modifications to the primordial spectrum (e.g., Cline et al 2003). In fact, CMB polarization towards galaxy clusters may provide a mechanism to look for the cut-off in primordial power spectrum (e.g., Seto & Pierpaoli 2005). If there is a cut-off in the spectrum at small scales, ISW signal remain unaffected and the ratio of ISW-to-SW contribution to polarization may be higher when compared to a model where large-scale power is not affected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarised Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect (Sazonov & Sunyaev 1999;Audit & Simmons 1999;Seto & Pierpaoli 2005), is expected to be very subdominant and is neglected here.…”
Section: Polarised Sunyaev-zel'dovich Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomson scattering of the primordial quadrupole at lower redshifts has been discussed in the context of using galaxy clusters as Thomson scatterers (Kamionkowski & Loeb 1997;Sazonov & Sunyaev 1999;Baumann & Cooray 2003;Portsmouth 2004;Seto & Pierpaoli 2005;Bunn 2006;Shimon et al 2006). High-redshift 21 cm emission has several important advantages: (1) the Thomson optical depth can be accurately reconstructed from the 21 cm map, while galaxy cluster optical depths derived from Sunyaev-Zel'dovich measurements are weighted by the Compton y-parameter and thus are not appropriate for this purpose (Knox et al 2004); (2) the overlap in information of the CMB quadrupole at and our measured z ∼ 10 CMB sky is much reduced when compared with clusters at (local clusters are better as probes of the integrated z ∼ 0.2-0.5 Sachs-Wolfe effect); and 3) the CMB polarization signal will not be correlated with a large Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, gravitational lensing of the CMB, radio halos, quasar and galaxy overdensities, or strongly lensed background objects.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%