Probing Lithium-Ion Battery Electrolytes with Laboratory Near-Ambient Pressure XPS

Abstract

In this article, we present Near Ambient Pressure (NAP)-X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) results from model and commercial liquid electrolytes for lithium-ion battery production using an automated laboratory NAP-XPS system. The electrolyte solutions were (i) LiPF6 in EC/DMC (LP30) as a typical commercial battery electrolyte and (ii) LiTFSI in PC as a model electrolyte. We analyzed the LP30 electrolyte solution, first in its vapor and liquid phase to compare individual core-level spectra. In a second step, we immersed a V2O5 crystal as a model cathode material in this LiPF6 solution. Additionally, the LiTFSI electrolyte model system was studied to compare and verify our findings with previous NAP-XPS data. Photoelectron spectra recorded at pressures of 2–10 mbar show significant chemical differences for the different lithium-based electrolytes. We show the enormous potential of laboratory NAP-XPS instruments for investigations of solid-liquid interfaces in electrochemical energy storage systems at elevated pressures and illustrate the simplicity and ease of the used experimental setup (EnviroESCA).

Advanced XPS characterization: XPS-based multi-technique analyses for comprehensive understanding of functional materials

“…129 For now, these remain on the cusp of lab-based surface analysis, but work from multiple independent groups are bringing such cells closer to widespread use. [130][131][132][133][134] In situ electrochemical XPS studies offer huge potential in electrochemistry research and further developments are expected to be made as the field progresses.…”

Time-resolved in situ DRIFTS study on NH3-SCR of NO on a CeO2/TiO2 catalyst

“…The O 1s spectra could be well fitted into two characteristic peaks at 530.2 ± 0.1 eV and 532 ± 0.1 eV (Fig. 5b and 6), which could be assigned to Ti-O/Ce-O bands and surface oxygen species (O α ), 33,34 respectively. It showed a decreasing trend of O α after reactive gas treatment, while there was 36% of O α on the surface of the fresh CeO 2 /TiO 2 catalyst, similar to the oxygen content from XPS results (Table 1).…”

Interfaces and Interphases in Batteries: How to Identify and Monitor Them Properly Using Surface Sensitive Characterization Techniques

“…iv) Incorrect peak assignments can lead to wrong conclusions. [ 59 ] Several of the aforementioned issues can be circumvented to deepen our understanding of the chemical composition of interphase layer. Regarding the depth of investigation, there are two possible solutions.…”