2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00676a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing liquid surfaces under vacuum using SEM and ToF-SIMS

Abstract: We report a newly developed self-contained interface for high-vapor pressure liquid surfaces to vacuum-based analytical instruments. It requires no wires or tubing connections to the outside of the instrument and uses a microfluidic channel with a 3 μm diameter window into the flowing fluid beneath it. This window supports the liquid against the vacuum by the liquid's surface tension and limits the high-density vapor region traversed by the probe beams to only a few microns. We demonstrate this microfluidic in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
130
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition has been successfully used in our recent biofilm and single cell research [21,27]. Figure 5 compares the positive and negative ion spectra of a living biofilm sample using a 200 nm 0.20 pA Bi + beam (a typical condition used in our initial papers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]) and a 500 nm 0.36 pA + beam appeared similar to the negative secondary ion spectrum using the 200 nm 0.20 pA Bi + beam. However, the signal intensity of the former also showed a~two orders of magnitude improvement.…”
Section: Signal Improvement Of Biofilm and Cell Samplesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This condition has been successfully used in our recent biofilm and single cell research [21,27]. Figure 5 compares the positive and negative ion spectra of a living biofilm sample using a 200 nm 0.20 pA Bi + beam (a typical condition used in our initial papers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]) and a 500 nm 0.36 pA + beam appeared similar to the negative secondary ion spectrum using the 200 nm 0.20 pA Bi + beam. However, the signal intensity of the former also showed a~two orders of magnitude improvement.…”
Section: Signal Improvement Of Biofilm and Cell Samplesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In most of our previous studies, a 25 keV Bi + beam was used as the primary ion beam, and the beam size was focused tõ 200 nm diameter with a current of 0.2-1.0 pA [11,[13][14][15]. The Bi + beam was chosen because it was the most abundant primary ion species, and it could provide the highest current with our instrument (IONTOF V) [29,30].…”
Section: Beam Damage Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations