2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability of detecting influenza A virus subtypes H1N1 and H3N2 in individual pig nasal swabs and pen-based oral fluid specimens over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oral fluid can be easily collected from pens of pigs and used for the diagnosis of a number of key endemic and exotic diseases as well as biomarkers of stress or metabolic state (Prickett et al., ; Kittawornrat et al., , ; Detmer et al., ; Ramirez et al., ; Goodell et al., ; Vosloo et al., ; Panyasing et al., ). Pen‐based oral fluid provides a non‐invasive sample type that is easy to collect, resulting in a lower overall cost compared with individual animal sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral fluid can be easily collected from pens of pigs and used for the diagnosis of a number of key endemic and exotic diseases as well as biomarkers of stress or metabolic state (Prickett et al., ; Kittawornrat et al., , ; Detmer et al., ; Ramirez et al., ; Goodell et al., ; Vosloo et al., ; Panyasing et al., ). Pen‐based oral fluid provides a non‐invasive sample type that is easy to collect, resulting in a lower overall cost compared with individual animal sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, the diagnostic test sensitivity values on OF samples could be outside the range of values used in this evaluation. Lower published rRT-PCR sensitivity values can be found for influenza A virus in swine [42] and other tests used with endemic disease monitoring [43]. Additionally, this evaluation did not include an adjustment factor for field impacts from animal behavior, sample dilution, degradation, handling, and submission logistics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Additionally, oral fluids may provide a wider window of IAV detection than nasal swabs following initial infection. However, IAV isolation from oral fluids has been problematic with only 50% of virus isolation attempts resulting in IAV recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%