2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability distribution of pitting corrosion depth and rate in underground pipelines: A Monte Carlo study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that Markov chain predictive model was best for describing the corrosion distributions [23]. Caleyo et al [19] also used Monte Carlo simulation to model pit depth growth of underground pipelines in different soil conditions and fitted the three maximal extreme value distributions -Weibull, Fretchet and Gumbel to the resulting best fit models of the studied soils, however, Fretchet distribution was best for describing the best fit model over a long-time exposure as was already stated in this work. Again, another work on experimental determination of internal pitting rate in pipelines concluded that increases in pitting rate occurs due to increased chloride concentration, temperature, subcutaneous substances (such as sand) and flow rate whereas decrease in pitting rate was observed with increase in bicarbonate, CO2 and H2S partial pressures and operating pressure [4], however, the results in this research were validated with limited field data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that Markov chain predictive model was best for describing the corrosion distributions [23]. Caleyo et al [19] also used Monte Carlo simulation to model pit depth growth of underground pipelines in different soil conditions and fitted the three maximal extreme value distributions -Weibull, Fretchet and Gumbel to the resulting best fit models of the studied soils, however, Fretchet distribution was best for describing the best fit model over a long-time exposure as was already stated in this work. Again, another work on experimental determination of internal pitting rate in pipelines concluded that increases in pitting rate occurs due to increased chloride concentration, temperature, subcutaneous substances (such as sand) and flow rate whereas decrease in pitting rate was observed with increase in bicarbonate, CO2 and H2S partial pressures and operating pressure [4], however, the results in this research were validated with limited field data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restrepo et al (2009) applied the proportionate stratified sampling method to establish "index of aggressiveness" (IA) of the soil, with contributors including soil moisture, pH, redox potential, pipe-soil potential , soil resistivity, and sulphide content. Caleyo et al (2009) investigated the distributions of several soil properties along a 50-year old oil steel pipeline. They then proposed a Rossum (1969)-type multivariate power model to predict maximum pits depths as a function of soil properties and time of exposure and used the probability distributions of the soil properties to carry on a Monte-Carlo analysis to discern the distribution of corrosion pit growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitting corrosion is an extremely dangerous form of localized corrosion since a perforation resulting from a single pit can cause complete in-service failure of installations like water pipes, heat exchanger tubes or oil tank used for example in chemical plants or nuclear power stations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The pits depth distribution is an important characteristic of the extent of such damage; the deeper the pits, the more dramatic the damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%