1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.54.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilities for histories in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of approaches to this problem [2]. In this paper, an unexpected close relationship is found between a real time Feynman path integral approach [3,4,5] and the quantum shutter approach [6,7], which are, at first sight, unlikely to be related.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are a number of approaches to this problem [2]. In this paper, an unexpected close relationship is found between a real time Feynman path integral approach [3,4,5] and the quantum shutter approach [6,7], which are, at first sight, unlikely to be related.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The definability of the probability distribution depends on whether or not the amplitude distribution has the property of orthogonality, i.e., whether or not the classes of Feynman paths taking time τ 1 and τ 2 (τ 1 = τ 2 ) to traverse the region interfere. For rectangular barriers, one of the authors studied the interference quantitatively to conclude that (i) a probability distribution is not definable [3,4] but (ii) the range of the values of tunneling time is definable [4]. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature on propositions in quantum mechanics that refer to more than one time is long [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. To deal with this, people have tried to define time in quantum mechanics as an operator [29][30][31], or using physical internal clocks [19,20] or using path integral approaches [21,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In this paper we will use the decoherent histories approach as in [39].…”
Section: Arrival Time Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the results of such papers are not necessarily wrong, they often do not have sensible classical limits and in measurement-based models, they may, unknowingly, only be valid in the regime of strong measurement. These problems with the Zeno effect in path integral constructions can be seen in a number of early attempts to define probabilities for spacetime regions in the context of the decoherent histories approach [23,24,25,26,27,28,32] and in some papers on the decoherent histories approach to quantum cosmology [10,11,12,13,14]. A possible resolution was given in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%