Amplitudes for spacetime regions and the quantum Zeno effect: pitfalls of standard path integral constructions

Abstract

Path integrals appear to offer natural and intuitively appealing methods for defining quantum-mechanical amplitudes for questions involving spacetime regions. For example, the amplitude for entering a spatial region during a given time interval is typically defined by summing over all paths between given initial and final points but restricting them to pass through the region at any time. We argue that there is, however, under very general conditions, a significant complication in such constructions. This is the fact that the concrete implementation of the restrictions on paths over an interval of time corresponds, in an operator language, to sharp monitoring at every moment of time in the given time interval. Such processes suffer from the quantum Zeno effect -the continual monitoring of a quantum system in a Hilbert subspace prevents its state from leaving that subspace. As a consequence, path integral amplitudes defined in this seemingly obvious way have physically and intuitively unreasonable properties and in particular, no sensible classical limit. In this paper we describe this frequentlyoccurring but little-appreciated phenomenon in some detail, showing clearly the connection with the quantum Zeno effect. We then show that it may be avoided by implementing the restriction on paths in the path integral in a "softer" way. The resulting amplitudes then involve a new coarse graining parameter, which may be taken to be a timescale ǫ, describing the softening of the restrictions on the paths. We argue that the complications arising from the Zeno effect are then negligible as long as ǫ ≫ 1/E, where E is the energy scale of the incoming state. Our criticisms of path integral constructions largely apply to approaches to quantum theory such as the decoherent histories approach or quantum measure theory, which do not specifically involve measurements. We address some criticisms of our approach by Sokolovksi, concerning the relevance of our results to measurement-based models.

Quantum interference of position and momentum: A particle propagation paradox

“…In particular, it has been shown that the current of probability described by the Schrödinger equation can point in the opposite direction of all available momentum components [9,10]. It is therefore reasonable to ask whether quantum theory might require modifications to Newton's first law [11][12][13]. Unfortunately, it is difficult to identify such modifications using only a statistical analysis of the available data.…”

A ‘problem of time’ in the multiplicative scheme for then-site hopper

“…If so, this would increase the relevance of the n-site hopper. The decoherence functional or quantum measure in the continuum is not yet able to be defined for events other than finite unions of events corresponding to finite sequences of projections onto position [5,11,30,31]. If the n-site hoppers have a continuum limit one could potentially use this to define the quantum measure of an event in the continuum as the limit of a sequence of appropriate n-site hopper events as n → ∞.…”

Control of particle propagation beyond the uncertainty limit by interference between position and momentum

“…Quantum mechanics replaces the precise concepts of particle position and particle momentum with the rather less clear concept of a quantum state that describes only the statistical distributions of possible particle positions and particle momenta. Since statistical statements are by their very nature incomplete, there is much room left for speculation regarding the quantum limit of motion for individual point-like particles [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Interestingly, very little of the discussion has focused on the simplification of quantitative criteria for the evaluation of particle propagation, and most of the proposed experimental approaches involve quite a bit of complicated data analysis [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”