2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0276-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic assessment of structures considering the effect of cumulative damage under seismic sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultimate resistance condition is associated to ℎ = 23 m [41] and a value of 𝜆 equal to 0.124 m at ∆𝑡 = 0 years, representing an exceedance rate equal to 0.0248 with a return period of being exceeded of 40.32 years. Numerical demand exceedance rates can be fitted by the following expression [52]:…”
Section: Demand Exceedance Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ultimate resistance condition is associated to ℎ = 23 m [41] and a value of 𝜆 equal to 0.124 m at ∆𝑡 = 0 years, representing an exceedance rate equal to 0.0248 with a return period of being exceeded of 40.32 years. Numerical demand exceedance rates can be fitted by the following expression [52]:…”
Section: Demand Exceedance Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 shows only one realization. Numerical demand exceedance rates can be fitted by the following expression [52]:…”
Section: Demand Exceedance Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiu (2014) considers the cumulative damage in a reliability-based service life using energy concepts. Likewise, Tolentino et al (2018) and Tenderan et al (2019) consider the cumulative damage based on displacements and drifts due to sequences of seismic events. However, Raghunandan et al (2015) and Jalayer and Ebrahimian (2017) studied the cumulative damage but based only on a main event—aftershock sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figura 2.1. Representación del daño evolutivo (adaptado de Tolentino et al, 2018) tiempo se puede cuantificar por medio de un índice de daño, 𝐼𝑑 i (𝑡, 𝑦), que relaciona distorsiones en el tiempo como sigue (Tolentino et al, 2018):…”
Section: Diseñounclassified
“…Para el caso de los amortiguadores, se demuestra la viabilidad de estos como una medida de mitigación, reduciendo estos la demanda de aceleración y desplazamiento. Tolentino et al (2018) describen un enfoque general que considera el daño acumulado que una estructura experimenta ante la acción de eventos símicos a lo largo de un intervalo de tiempo, considerando las incertidumbres asociadas a la demanda y capacidad estructural; el daño acumulado se cuantifica por medio de un índice de daño que relaciona la distorsión demandada, la de fluencia y la de falla; estas bajo un instante de tiempo e intensidad dados. Finalmente, como resultado se presenta un índice de confiabilidad estructural en el tiempo; aunque dicho enfoque es general, en dicha investigación se limitó a un puente de concreto reforzado.…”
unclassified