2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2005.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privatization and restructuring in China: Evidence from shareholding ownership, 1995–2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
95
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
95
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 3 The rise in corporate profitability is an outcome of a series of socioeconomic and institutional changes implemented in China throughout the reform period. For instance, the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and the growth of private enterprises are found to have induced more innovative efforts and raised the labor and total factor productivity of the corporate sector (Jefferson and Su, 2006;Bai et al, 2009). Labor market reforms involving the use of labor-incentive schemes, the relaxation of worker mobility restrictions, and especially the massive rural-urban migration have all contributed to the efficient functioning of firms.…”
Section: Rising Profitability Of Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 The rise in corporate profitability is an outcome of a series of socioeconomic and institutional changes implemented in China throughout the reform period. For instance, the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and the growth of private enterprises are found to have induced more innovative efforts and raised the labor and total factor productivity of the corporate sector (Jefferson and Su, 2006;Bai et al, 2009). Labor market reforms involving the use of labor-incentive schemes, the relaxation of worker mobility restrictions, and especially the massive rural-urban migration have all contributed to the efficient functioning of firms.…”
Section: Rising Profitability Of Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, two World Bank economists (Yusuf, Nabeshima) and Perkins (2006) continue the argument for privatization, if not accelerated privatization, of China's SOEs: "The desirable next steps for China's long-running SOE reform …would be the full privatization of industrial enterprises" (p. 42). Others confirm that privatization of SOEs tends to lead to better performance in the privatized SOEs (for example, Jefferson and Su, 2006). 3 But judging SOEs by their financial performance ignores the potentially significant positive externalities of SOEs, one of which is the linkage effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the central government-sponsored major ownership reforms, such as share issuing privatization, failed to improve the performance of SOEs. 66 65 Without differentiating between MBO and non-MBO privatization, by examining formerly state-owned large and medium-size enterprises for the period from 1994 to 1999 nationwide, Jefferson and Jian Su (2006) found that privatization increased productivity and investments in research and development. Similarly, based on firm level data collected from one city, Xiao-yuan Dong, Louis Putterman, and Bulent Unel (2006) found that privatization has significantly improved productivity and profitability for urban firms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%