2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2002.tb00329.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privatisation of Ports ‐ an Evaluation of the Malaysian Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Management of Aceh ports should also apply a variety of strategies 1 to improve the organizational and the operational performances including the modernization of the ports' administration and management; liberalization or de-regulation of the ports' services; commercialization; corporatization; and privatization. In this regard, Aceh can emulate Malaysia in managing the ports as aptly described by Tull and Reveley (2001) that a sound management and a competitive environment are central to port efficiency.…”
Section: Competence-based Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management of Aceh ports should also apply a variety of strategies 1 to improve the organizational and the operational performances including the modernization of the ports' administration and management; liberalization or de-regulation of the ports' services; commercialization; corporatization; and privatization. In this regard, Aceh can emulate Malaysia in managing the ports as aptly described by Tull and Reveley (2001) that a sound management and a competitive environment are central to port efficiency.…”
Section: Competence-based Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the PKFZ scandal, Port Klang was widely regarded as a successful example of the benefits of corporatising state‐owned enterprises, a claim centred on the period from 1985 onwards when all but a handful of those previously employed by the state‐owned Kelang Container Terminal at North Port transferred their contracts over to an ostensibly private sector, yet government‐linked, company (Tull and Reveley, 2002; Hill et al ., 2008). Those employed in North Port began to work after that time under conditions that have subsequently been cited as a model for tripartite labour privatisation and well‐managed divestment (Jones and Abbas, 1992; Kikeri, 1997; Haarmeyer and Yorke, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%