2001
DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1302_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private Issues and Public Policy: Locating the Corporate Agenda in Agenda-Setting Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such first-level and second-level agenda building theories are mostly applied in democratic societies where interest groups and policy makers reach the public and influence their opinions by building mass media agendas (Berger, 2001;Kim et al, 2015, Kleinnijenhuis, Schultz, Utz, & Oegema, 2013. Democratic conditions for agenda building, however, seem not to be present in the RCSC case given the social and political situations in China.…”
Section: Agenda Building and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such first-level and second-level agenda building theories are mostly applied in democratic societies where interest groups and policy makers reach the public and influence their opinions by building mass media agendas (Berger, 2001;Kim et al, 2015, Kleinnijenhuis, Schultz, Utz, & Oegema, 2013. Democratic conditions for agenda building, however, seem not to be present in the RCSC case given the social and political situations in China.…”
Section: Agenda Building and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The basic theoretical assertion that media salience of political issues leads to the salience of those issues in public opinion have been extended to various objects including political candidates, international and business relationship (McCombs and Ghanem, 2001;McCombs and Reynolds, 2002). Furthermore, in PR scholarship, the core theoretical view of agenda-setting has been extended to examine how PR activities contribute to the formation of the media agenda (eg, Berger, 2001;Curtin, 1999). In other words, PR professionals influence the media agenda mainly through information subsidies such as news conferences, news releases and interviews.…”
Section: First/second-level Agenda-building and Agenda-settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudiosos como Berger (2001) referiram que a implicação de um ator corporativo no processo de agendamento assume a forma de um processo influenciador em duas fases: primeiro, a corporação desenvolve a sua própria agenda de assuntos políticos, e, em segundo lugar, ativa os seus canais de influência orientados para outras agendas específicas -agendas dos media, políticas e públicas -, de modo a obter resultados favoráveis e, finalmente, a influenciar a tomada de decisão.…”
Section: éTica Do Poder: Agenda Corporativa Vs Agenda Dos Mediaunclassified