1990
DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(90)90100-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private investment and economic growth in developing countries

Abstract: Despite t h e growing support f o r market-oriented strategies, and for a greater role of private investment, empirical growth models for developing countries typically make no distinction between the private and p u b l i c components a f investment. This paper sheds some l i g h t on this important issue by formulating a simple growth model t h a t separates the effects of public sector and private sector investment. This model is estimated for a cross-section sample of 24 developing countrtes, and the resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
185
3
7

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
16
185
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…While this variation of the incremental capital output relationship meets the criteria of simplicity, which makes it applicable even in countries with limited data, it has the considerable drawback of being unstable over time. Projections of output growth based on variants of a production function are routinely subject to large and variable errors, and yet a neoclassical 9This average is hi&her than the 0.2 value~btained by Khan and Reinhart (1990) for a cross-section sample of 24 developmg countries but is in line with Tyler (1981), who obtained a value of 0.25. Balassa (1978) found the marginal product to be about 0.16.…”
Section: How Well Can a Production Function Explain Output Growth?mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this variation of the incremental capital output relationship meets the criteria of simplicity, which makes it applicable even in countries with limited data, it has the considerable drawback of being unstable over time. Projections of output growth based on variants of a production function are routinely subject to large and variable errors, and yet a neoclassical 9This average is hi&her than the 0.2 value~btained by Khan and Reinhart (1990) for a cross-section sample of 24 developmg countries but is in line with Tyler (1981), who obtained a value of 0.25. Balassa (1978) found the marginal product to be about 0.16.…”
Section: How Well Can a Production Function Explain Output Growth?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As in Robinson (1971), International Monetary Fund (1988, and Khan and Reinhart (1990), the growth function estimated takes the form…”
Section: How Well Can a Production Function Explain Output Growth?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the case of developed economy in 1980s, (Aschauer, 1989) shows that the decreasing in public infrastructure expenditures confirms that the part of the productivity does not increase. A large part of literature and researches that analyzed whether public capital leads to participate in increasing output growth and/or the productivity of private investment have followed these studies: (Munnell, 1990;Khan & Reinhart, 1990;Barro, 1990;Easterly & Rebelo, 1993;Tatom, 1991Tatom, , 1993Evans & Karras, 1994a, 1994bRamirez, 1998;Khan & Kumar, 1997).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5;2014 growth. The authors who have contributed to investment analysis in Africa are: Oshikoya (1994), Mlambo and Oshikoya (1999), Devarajan et al (1999), Mataya and Veeman (1996), Khan and Reinhart (1990), and Gunning and Mengistae (1999). Writing on the macroeconomic determinants of domestic private investment in Africa, Oshikoya (1994) found a positive relationship between public investment and private investment.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent empirical studies have established linkages between investment and economic growth (e.g., Barro, 1991;Barro & Lee, 1993;Ben-David, 1998;Collier & Gunning, 1999;Ghura & Hadjimichael, 1996;Hernandez, 2000;Khan & Reinhart, 1990;Ndikumana, 2000). Analysis of causality between economic growth and domestic investment conducted in different countries are marred with ambiguities and inconclusive results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%