Privacy Mechanisms for Drones

Yao, Yaxing; Xia, Huichuan; Huang, Yun; Wang, Yan

doi:10.1145/3025453.3025907

Cited by 43 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some researchers design non-technical systems to solve privacy problems. Considering personal drones, Yao et al propose the design of a legal registration system as well as the technical design of the drone to provide privacy and enforcement [124]. In design to solve a privacy problem, privacy is a problem that has already been well-defined outside of the design process.…”

Section: Purpose: How Privacy Is Addressed By Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bringing Design to the Privacy Table

Wong

Mulligan

2019

Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In calls for privacy by design (PBD), regulators and privacy scholars have investigated the richness of the concept of "privacy." In contrast, "design" in HCI is comprised of rich and complex concepts and practices, but has received much less attention in the PBD context. Conducting a literature review of HCI publications discussing privacy and design, this paper articulates a set of dimensions along which design relates to privacy, including: the purpose of design, which actors do design work in these settings, and the envisioned beneficiaries of design work. We suggest new roles for HCI and design in PBD research and practice: utilizing valuesand critically-oriented design approaches to foreground social values and help define privacy problem spaces. We argue such approaches, in addition to current "design to solve privacy problems" efforts, are essential to the full realization of PBD, while noting the politics involved when choosing design to address privacy. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy; • Social and professional topics → Computing / technology policy; • Human-centered computing → HCI design and evaluation methods.

show abstract

Section: Purpose: How Privacy Is Addressed By Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bringing Design to the Privacy Table

Wong

Mulligan

2019

Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This includes research on collaborative access control models (see for instance [48] for a recent literature review), as well as the extensive literature on multiuser and interdependent privacy (see for instance [24,59] for recent literature reviews on the topic). In all cases, there is a recognition that, in modern online and mobile systems, the privacy and security of one user is no longer an individual matter [4,15,24,32,38,59,61,68,70,71]. That is, the privacy and security of one user does not only depend on what that user does with her data, but it also depends on what other users do with that data.…”

Section: Multiuser Privacy and Security Conflictsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As detailed in Section 2.2, multiuser privacy and security conflicts occur in other domains too, such as social media, smart homes, mobile phones, autonomous systems, shared accounts, etc. [4,15,24,32,38,59,68,70,71]. In particular, the majority of the work on how and why MCs occur has so far focused on social media, with extensive empirical research to study the phenomemon in that domain [6,10,18,27,32,55,60,68].…”

Section: What Are the Differences And Similarities Between Cloud Mcs ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiuser Privacy and Security Conflicts in the Cloud

Alhelali

Ramokapane

Such

2023

Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Social acceptability of technology usage has been inverstigated for various contexts and situations [13] or by particular user groups, e.g., for accessability [20,25] or in medical use cases [4,27]. • Ethical and social implications of particular classes of technologies, were looked at e.g., for wearables [11], smart glasses [5], drones [26,14], lifelogging cameras [12] and CCTV [17], as well as discussed for ubiquitous computing in general [2]. • A further string of research e.g., by the University of Twente 1 (Netherlands), covers intelligent personal assistants and human-robot-interaction.…”

Section: Existing Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

(Un)Acceptable!?!

Koelle

Böll

Olsson

et al. 2018

Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A central viewpoint to understanding the human aspects of interactive systems is the concept of technology acceptance. Actual, or imagined disapproval from other people can have a major impact on how information technological innovations are received, but HCI lacks comprehensive, up-to date, and actionable, articulations of "social acceptability". The spread of information and communication technologies (ICT) into all aspects of our lives appears to have dramatically increased the range and scale of potential issues with social acceptance. This workshop brings together academics and practitioners to discuss what social acceptance and acceptability mean in the context of various emerging technologies and modern humancomputer interaction. We aim to bring the concept of social acceptability in line with the current technology landscape, as well as to identify relevant research steps for making it more useful, actionable and researchable with well-operationalized metrics.

show abstract

Privacy Mechanisms for Drones

Cited by 43 publications

References 23 publications

Bringing Design to the Privacy Table

Bringing Design to the Privacy Table

Multiuser Privacy and Security Conflicts in the Cloud

(Un)Acceptable!?!

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About