Prioritization of critical source areas for soil and water conservation by using a one‐at‐a‐time removal approach in the upper Huaihe River basin

Abstract

Appropriate land use planning plays an active role in soil and water conservation. Considering the financial investment and grain security limitations, land use planning practices should be applied focusing on the critical source areas (CSAs) rather than the complete region. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to identify CSAs for sediment control in the upper Huaihe River basin. A novel one‐at‐a‐time removal approach was proposed which involves individually removing the land use planning programme at sub‐basin level, after which the related runoff and sediment results were simulated by the validated SWAT model. Then, two influencing indexes (i.e., runoff yield and sediment yield) were used to evaluate the influences on runoff and sediment responses at the watershed outlet, caused by the removal of that land use planning programme. Finally, critical sub‐basins for land use planning were prioritized based on the weighted average of those influencing indexes. Calibration and validation results showed that the SWAT model well represented the monthly streamflow and sediment at the watershed outlet. The Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values of monthly streamflow and sediment were generally greater than 0.75. Results of the integrated priorities revealed that the most CSAs affecting land use planning implementation were in sub‐basin 11, which was not the sub‐basin yielding the most sediment. The CSAs prioritization determined by the one‐at‐a‐time removal approach can achieve a better erosion control performance than that identified by the simulated sediment loads, which can be applied widely in targeting CSAs for implementation of watershed conservation practices with limited investment and disturbance.

Identifying Most Suitable Priority Areas for Soil-Water Conservation Using Coupling Mechanism in Guwahati Urban Watershed

“…However, prioritization of watershed and landscape planning are often considered for developing and implementing robust management and restoration strategies (Sharda et al, 2021). Prioritization is key to identifying areas that need attention (Yu et al, 2021;Abdeta et al, 2020). Due to time and cost constraints, it is challenging to undertake restoration and soil and water conservation work at all sites simultaneously in a watershed management program.…”

Seleção, caracterização e eleição de microbacias com jazidas de bauxita para fins de monitoramento automatizado

“…É reconhecido que os processos ambientais são mais intimamente interligados e geograficamente isolados nas microbacias, o que as torna áreas frágeis, sendo consideradas prioritárias a conservação (CALIJURI; BUBEL, 2006). Contudo, a definição das microbacias prioritárias exige a caracterização e seleção de diferentes áreas (KETEMA; DWARAKISH, YU et al, 2020).…”