Prior Alliances with Targets and Acquisition Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Industries

Abstract

An important focus of the research on mergers and acquisitions is the conditions under which acquisitions create value for the acquiring firm's shareholders. Given that the acquisition process is plagued by serious issues of information asymmetry, which are exacerbated in the context of knowledge acquisitions, we examine whether prior alliances with potential targets reduce the information asymmetry enough to create "partnerspecific absorptive capacity" and yield superior stock returns on acquisition, compared with acquisitions not preceded by alliances. We test our hypotheses on a sample of high-technology acquisitions by U.S. firms during 1990-1998 using an event study methodology to assess abnormal stock returns. We find, unexpectedly, that no significant general effect emerges for acquisitions with prior alliances. However, international acquisitions following alliances show significantly better returns relative to both acquisitions without prior alliances and domestic acquisitions. Additionally, stronger forms of prior alliances lead to better acquisition performance than weaker forms of alliances. Together, the results broadly support our thesis that partner-specific absorptive capacity may be at work and suggest that under certain prior alliance conditions, acquisitions can indeed create value for acquirers.

Theoretical foundations of equity based foreign market entry decisions: A review of the literature and recommendations for future research

“…Scholars may draw on RBT and network theories to examine the interaction between firm resource and capabilities, use of networks, and FME choices and performance. Similarly, networks could be a source of trust or mistrust and therefore scholars could integrate network theory with TCE to determine the type of effectiveness of FME decisions (Zaheer, Hernandez & Banerjee, 2010). Furthermore, He and Wei (2013) argued that managers with extensive external networks may leap frog those that do not possess such networks in accessing psychically distant markets.…”

The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure

“…First, because in most markets information regarding the availability, reliability, and resource profiles of potential partners is not perfectly distributed, many organizations tend to economize in their search for partners by selecting those with whom they have some familiarity, either directly or indirectly, through prior partners (e.g., Gulati and Gargiulo 1999, Shipilov and Li 2012, Zaheer et al 2010. Local partnering enables organizations to effectively tap into a network that generates referrals to and background information on prospective partners.…”

Do Experience Effects Vary Across Governance Modes? Evidence from New Product Introduction in the Global Aircraft Industry, 1948–2000

“…It is among the first to examine whether the potential for improvement through experiential learning differs across expansion modes. Several studies have examined how same-mode experience affects performance in collaborations and corporate acquisitions (see Barkema and Schijven 2008 for a review), and others have analyzed the impact of collaborative experience on later acquisition performance (Villalonga and McGahan 2005, Agarwal et al 2006, Nadolska and Barkema 2007, Zaheer et al 2010, Zollo and Reuer 2010, but to the best of our knowledge, no previous work has compared experiential learning processes across internal growth, collaboration, and external sourcing. Our study is an initial step toward filling this gap.…”