2014
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Experience Effects Vary Across Governance Modes? Evidence from New Product Introduction in the Global Aircraft Industry, 1948–2000

Abstract: We examine the potential for improved performance through experiential learning of three modes of new product introduction: internal development, joint development, and licensing. Drawing on the organizational learning literature, we argue that the speed of experiential learning—that is to say, the marginal performance benefit of experience—is higher when firms carry out activities that allow for a clearer understanding of cause–effect relationships, whereas experiential benefits plateau at higher levels of ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because time compression hampers the development of both individual mental models and coordination routines, both of which are more important in performing complex tasks. Thus, even though complex problems provide greater opportunities to learn (Haunschild & Sullivan, 2002; Mulotte, 2014; Rockart & Dutt, 2015), learning is less likely to be realized under time compression.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because time compression hampers the development of both individual mental models and coordination routines, both of which are more important in performing complex tasks. Thus, even though complex problems provide greater opportunities to learn (Haunschild & Sullivan, 2002; Mulotte, 2014; Rockart & Dutt, 2015), learning is less likely to be realized under time compression.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition‐I was computed by counting the number of HEV models offered by rival firms in the U.S. market for a given year. Our measurement of Competition‐I is arguably supported in prior literature (Anand, Mulotte, & Ren, ; Barroso & Giarratana, ; Danzon & Sousa Pereira, ; Federico, Langus, & Valletti, ; Gil & Ruzzier, ; Mulotte, ; Mulotte, Dussauge, & Mitchell, ; Tripsas, ). Competition‐II has been computed based on the entropy measure that takes into account the number of models and firms (Frenken, Hekkert, & Godfroij, ; Wesseling, Faber, & Hekkert, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, insufficient theory exists to answer these and similar questions [17]. Some knowledge exists in the management sciences about "new product development" [89]- [92] and engineering design researchers are conducting experiments on micro-level processes that produce better designs [50], [73], [93]- [95]. Still, much remains unknown.…”
Section: B Constituents Of Ces Development Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%