2014
DOI: 10.1109/led.2014.2300413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Printed Low-Voltage Fuse Memory on Paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore essential to find an eco-friendly and biodegradable substrate. In contrast to plastics, paper easily decays without giving rise to environmental concerns and has therefore been recently exploited as a useful substrate for electronic devices202122, resulting in paper electronics. It has several advantages compared to silicon and plastic substrates, with low raw material cost being the foremost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore essential to find an eco-friendly and biodegradable substrate. In contrast to plastics, paper easily decays without giving rise to environmental concerns and has therefore been recently exploited as a useful substrate for electronic devices202122, resulting in paper electronics. It has several advantages compared to silicon and plastic substrates, with low raw material cost being the foremost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The writing voltage was switched on at 0.0 s. The 3 µm wide bits fuse at low current which is clearly below the current sourcing capacity of printed batteries that is ~30 mA. The writing times were observed to vary possibly due to the random progression rate of electromigration failure, as already noted in [7]. The 50 nm thick samples were successfully fused with 8 V writing voltage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…After the fusing has occurred, optical microscope images shown in Figure 4 reveal that the width of the bits has decreased near the breakpoint due to Ag nanoparticle grain growth [3,7]. For the 3 µm nominal width sample shown in Figure 4 (a), the width of the bit is ~2.3 µm outside the breakpoint area, whereas for the bit of 10 µm nominal width in Figure 4 (b), the width is ~9.1 µm further away from the breakpoint.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations