2003
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2003.816391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Printed double-T monopole antenna for 2.4/5.2 GHz dual-band WLAN operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 471 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in imaginary value for propagation constant which validates the loss due to transmission. Hence, in the regions of negative permittivity, it provides more transmission loss which is evident from Equation (1). CSRR also has resonance behaviour, it introduces stop band at some frequencies and pass band at other frequencies.…”
Section: Antenna Structure and Designmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This results in imaginary value for propagation constant which validates the loss due to transmission. Hence, in the regions of negative permittivity, it provides more transmission loss which is evident from Equation (1). CSRR also has resonance behaviour, it introduces stop band at some frequencies and pass band at other frequencies.…”
Section: Antenna Structure and Designmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The techniques such as having different lengths of pole [1][2][3][4], shorting pin [5,6], shorting plate [7], slot [8,9], fractal [10], fractal slot [11] have been used in realizing dual/multi-band or wideband antenna. This paper analyses the role of metamaterial (MTM) in achieving multiband antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the operating frequency band of these antennas is small and, basically, does not exceed a few percent. There are microstrip antennas, whose operating frequency band by level of the VSWR ≤ 2 is 10 % or more [1][2][3][4][5]. However, by level of the VSWR ≤ 1.2 (|S(1,1)| ≤ −20 dB) their operating frequency band is usually less than 10 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a well-known drawback of the patch antenna is its intrinsic narrow bandwidth. Although different shapes of printed monopole antennas such as meander shaped [10], modified square-shaped [11], inverted double L-shaped [12], modified Inverted-L shaped [13], twin stepped patch [14], double-T shaped [15] and arc-shaped [16] are employed, they cannot provide a large enough bandwidth to cover wideband applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%