2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0884-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of Precision Prevention Science for Improving Recruitment and Retention of Participants

Abstract: Precision medicine and precision public health focus on identifying and providing the right intervention to the right population at the right time. Expanding on the concept, precision prevention science could allow the field to examine prevention programs to identify ways to make them more efficient and effective at scale, including addressing issues related to engagement and retention of participants. Research to date on engagement and retention has often focused on demographics and risk factors. The current … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What previous investigations suggest is that treatment preferences should not be ignored in the context of perinatal depression, as they might have important implications for help-seeking behaviors and related barriers, utilization of psychological resources, and access to care (Mallou, Boubeta, & Cueto, 2003;Supplee, Parekh, & Johnson, 2018). Unfortunately, however, important shortcomings in the existing literature make the current conclusions limited and difficult to generalize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…What previous investigations suggest is that treatment preferences should not be ignored in the context of perinatal depression, as they might have important implications for help-seeking behaviors and related barriers, utilization of psychological resources, and access to care (Mallou, Boubeta, & Cueto, 2003;Supplee, Parekh, & Johnson, 2018). Unfortunately, however, important shortcomings in the existing literature make the current conclusions limited and difficult to generalize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Precision home visiting is at the forefront of the home visiting field (Supplee et al, )—a field that provides critical services to low‐income families to help improve parental and child well‐being with long‐lasting preventative effects on mental and physical health outcomes. Despite home visiting receiving $400 million a year nationally for implementation efforts, these programs continue to struggle with implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing a precision approach to home visiting is a promising implementation strategy as it promotes adaptability while maintaining fidelity (Powell et al, ). In the absence of a large body of empirical evidence on active ingredients and the importance of participatory approaches in precision home visiting (Supplee et al, ), our process of adapting an evidence‐based home‐visiting program, Family Spirit, engaged a wide range of experienced stakeholders to inform how and when to tailor Family Spirit to better meet diverse family needs. This information helped us design the first precision home‐visiting approach in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ireland, the Child and Family Agency produced commissioning guidance to ensure that services available to children and families are improving outcomes in the most efficient, effective, equitable, proportionate and sustainable way (Child and Family agency, 2013 [136]). In New Zealand, SUPERU produced a guide to effective parenting programmes, designed to inform decision makers and investors in the social sector (SUPERU, 2015 [137]). In Sweden, the implementation of the Family Check Up intervention (Mauricio et al, 2018[138]) was supported by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment Framework (EPIS) which enabled successful scale up of the intervention over a number of years (Aarons, Hurlburt and Horwitz, 2011 [139]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%